Constitutional Elements of Judicial Independence: are they enough in the Constitution of Uzbekistan?

Abstract

This article argues that there are not sufficient constitutional elements of judicial independence in the Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. For foreign practice, the article analyzes the Constitution of the United States for the rules on ensuring judicial independence. Based on the analysis the article suggests that de-jure judicial independence is as important as de-facto judicial independence and Uzbekistan should improve its Constitution in order for it to have more standard constitutional elements aimed at ensuring judicial independence.

Topics

Identifiers

DOI

10.47689/2181-1415-vol3-iss10/s-pp205-212

Citations and references