SEMANTIC FIELD OF THE LEXICAL UNITS EXPRESSING HUMAN SPIRITUAL STATE IN THE ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
Abstract
<em>In sociolinguistics, Eckert has begun to ask how social meaning in variation is connected to affective meaning. She poses such questions as if social meaning leads to affective meaning, whether children learn social uses of variation through affect before extrapolating to categories of speakers, and whether affective meaning is actually separable from social meaning. Part of the complication is that display rules of emotions—and probably the experiences of emotions themselves—are not independent of a person’s place in the social order. Eckert’s examples include Colette, when being “negative” than when being “nice”. In our analyses, we can’t really separate the affective meaning from social categories like gender.</em>