Skip to main content
Article

Elliptic anisotropy measurement of the f0(980) hadron in proton-lead collisions and evidence for its quark-antiquark composition

Aram HayrapetyanYerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, ArmeniaA. TumasyanYerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, ArmeniaW. AdamInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaJ. W. AndrejkovicInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaT. BergauerInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaS. ChatterjeeK. DamanakisInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaM. DragicevicInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaPriya Sajid HussainInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaM. JeitlerInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaNatascha KrammerInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaA. LiInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaD. LikoInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaI. MikulecInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaJ. SchieckInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaR. SchöfbeckInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaD. SchwarzInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaM. SonawaneInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaS. TemplInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaW. WaltenbergerInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaC.-E. WulzInstitut für Hochenergiephysik, Vienna, AustriaM. R. DarwishUniversiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen, BelgiumX. JanssenUniversiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen, BelgiumP. Van MechelenUniversiteit Antwerpen, Antwerpen, BelgiumE. S. BolsVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumJ. D’HondtVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumSoumya DansanaVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumA. De MoorVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumM. DelcourtVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumH. El FahamVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumS. LowetteVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumI. MakarenkoVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumD. MüllerVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumS. TavernierVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumM. TytgatVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumG. P. Van OnsemVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumS. Van PutteVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumD. VanneromVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, BelgiumB. ClerbauxUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumA. DasUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumG. De LentdeckerUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumHugues EvardUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumL. FavartUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumP. GianneiosUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumD. HohovUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumJ. JaramilloUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumA. KhalilzadehUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumFakhri Alam KhanUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumK. LeeUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumM. MahdavikhorramiUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumA. MalaraUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumS. ParedesUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumLaurent ThomasUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumM. Vanden BemdenUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumC. Vander VeldeUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumP. VanlaerUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, BelgiumM. De CoenGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumD. DoburGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumY. HongGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumJ. KnolleGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumLuka LambrechtGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumG. MestdachGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumK. Mota AmariloGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumCésar RendónGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumA. SamalanGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumK. SkovpenGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumN. Van Den BosscheGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumJan van der LindenGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumLiam WezenbeekGhent University, Ghent, BelgiumA. BeneckeUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumA. BethaniUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumG. BrunoUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumC. CaputoUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumC. DelaereUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumI. S. DonertasUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumA. GiammancoUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumSa. JainUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumV. LemaitreUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumPaola MastrapasquaUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumK. MondalUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumT. T. TranUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumS. WertzUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, BelgiumG. A. AlvesCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilE. CoelhoCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilC. HenselCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilT. Menezes De OliveiraCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilA. MoraesCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilP. Rebello TelesCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilM. SoeiroCentro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Fisicas, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilW. L. Aldá JúniorUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilM. Alves Gallo PereiraUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilM. Barroso Ferreira FilhoUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilH. Brandao MalbouissonUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilW. CarvalhoUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilJ. ChinellatoUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilE. M. Da CostaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilG. G. Da SilveiraUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilD. De Jesus DamiãoUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, BrazilS. Fonseca De SouzaUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Nature Communicationsjournal2025en
ABI

Abstract

Abstract Despite the f 0 (980) hadron having been discovered half a century ago, the question about its quark content has not been settled: it might be an ordinary quark-antiquark ( $${{\rm{q}}}\overline{{{\rm{q}}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:math> ) meson, a tetraquark ( $${{\rm{q}}}\overline{{{\rm{q}}}}{{\rm{q}}}\overline{{{\rm{q}}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:math> ) exotic state, a kaon-antikaon ( $${{\rm{K}}}\overline{{{\rm{K}}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:math> ) molecule, or a quark-antiquark-gluon ( $${{\rm{q}}}\overline{{{\rm{q}}}}{{\rm{g}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> </mml:math> ) hybrid. This paper reports strong evidence that the f 0 (980) state is an ordinary $${{\rm{q}}}\overline{{{\rm{q}}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:math> meson, inferred from the scaling of elliptic anisotropies ( v 2 ) with the number of constituent quarks ( n q ), as empirically established using conventional hadrons in relativistic heavy ion collisions. The f 0 (980) state is reconstructed via its dominant decay channel f 0 (980) → π + π − , in proton-lead collisions recorded by the CMS experiment at the LHC, and its v 2 is measured as a function of transverse momentum ( p T ). It is found that the n q = 2 ( $${{\rm{q}}}\overline{{{\rm{q}}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:math> state) hypothesis is favored over n q = 4 ( $${{\rm{q}}}\overline{{{\rm{q}}}}{{\rm{q}}}\overline{{{\rm{q}}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:math> or $${{\rm{K}}}\overline{{{\rm{K}}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>K</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:math> states) by 7.7, 6.3, or 3.1 standard deviations in the p T &lt; 10, 8, or 6 GeV/ c ranges, respectively, and over n q = 3 ( $${{\rm{q}}}\overline{{{\rm{q}}}}{{\rm{g}}}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> <mml:mover> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>q</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>¯</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> </mml:math> hybrid state) by 3.5 standard deviations in the p T &lt; 8 GeV/ c range. This result represents the first determination of the quark content of the f 0 (980) state, made possible by using a novel approach, and paves the way for similar studies of other exotic hadron candidates.

Topics

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 067 references