Skip to main content
AkademIndex

Products

For developers

AkademBasesoonOpen API for the ecosystem
Latin
Article

<i>Euclid</i> preparation

S QuaiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaL. PozzettiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaM. TaliaDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaC. ManciniINAF-IASF MilanoP. CassataDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “G. Galilei”, Università di PadovaL. GabarraDepartment of Physics, Oxford UniversityV. Le BrunAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAMM. BolzonellaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaE. RossettiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di BolognaSandor KrukESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del CastilloB. R. GranettINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di BreraClaudia ScarlataMinnesota Institute for Astrophysics, University of MinnesotaM. MorescoDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaG. ZamoraniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaZ. MaoINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaD. VerganiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaX. Lopez LopezDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaA EniaDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di BolognaE. DaddiUniversité Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIMV. AllevatoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di CapodimonteI. A. ZinchenkoUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenM. MagliocchettiINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiM. SiudekInstitute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UAB, Carrer de Can Magrans, s/nL. BisigelloINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di PadovaG. De LuciaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteH. J. DickinsonSchool of Physical Sciences, The Open UniversityElisabeta LussoDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di FirenzeM. HirschmannInstitute of Physics, Laboratory for Galaxy Evolution, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Observatoire de SauvernyA. CimattiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaL. WangKapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of GroningenJenny G. SorceUniv. Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, UMR 9189 CRIStALK. JahnkęUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut d’astrophysique spatialeA. AmaraSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Surrey, GuildfordS. AndreonINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di BreraN. AuricchioINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaC. BaccigalupiIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseMarco BaldiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di BolognaS BardelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaA BivianoIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseE. BranchiniDipartimento di Fisica, Università di GenovaM. BresciaDepartment of Physics “E. Pancini”, University Federico IIJ BrinchmannEuropean Southern ObservatoryS. CameraDipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di TorinoG Cañas-HerreraEuropean Space Agency/ESTECV. CapobiancoINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoC. CarboneINAF-IASF MilanoJ. CarreteroCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)Santiago CasasInstitute for Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology (TTK), RWTH Aachen UniversityM. CastellanoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaG CastignaniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. CavuotiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di CapodimonteK. C. ChambersInstitute for Astronomy, University of HawaiiC. Colodro-CondeInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasG CongedoInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal ObservatoryChristopher J. ConseliceJodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of ManchesterL. ConversiESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del CastilloY. CopinUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822F. CourbinInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA)H. M. CourtoisUCB Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IUF, IP2I LyonA. Da SilvaDepartamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Edifício C8, Campo GrandeH. DegaudenziDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaS. de la TorreAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAMH. DoleUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut d’astrophysique spatialeM DouspisUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut d’astrophysique spatialeF. DubathDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaX. DupacESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del CastilloS DusiniINFN-PadovaA. EaletUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822S. EscoffierAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMM. FarinaINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiR. FarinelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaF. FaustiniINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaS. FerriolUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822F FinelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaN. FourmanoitAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMM. FrailisINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteE. FranceschiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. GaleottaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteKoshy GeorgeUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenW. GillardAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMB. GillisInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal ObservatoryC. GiocoliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaJ. Gracia-CarpioMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsA GrazianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di PadovaF GruppMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsL. GuzzoDipartimento di Fisica “Aldo Pontremoli”, Università degli Studi di MilanoS. V. H. HauganInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of OsloW. N. HolmesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyI. HookDepartment of Physics, Lancaster UniversityF HormuthFelix Hormuth EngineeringA. HornstrupCosmic Dawn Center (DAWN)P. HudelotInstitut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR 7095, CNRS, and Sorbonne UniversitéK JahnkeMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieM JhabvalaNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterB. JoachimiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College LondonE KeihänenS. KermicheAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMA. KiesslingJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyB. KubikUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822M KümmelUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
ABI

Abstract

We introduce SpectraPyle , a versatile spectral stacking pipeline developed for the Euclid mission’s NISP spectroscopic surveys, aimed at extracting faint emission lines and spectral features from large galaxy samples in the Wide and Deep Surveys. Designed for computational efficiency and flexible configuration, SpectraPyle supports the processing of extensive datasets critical to Euclid ’s non-cosmological science goals. We validated the pipeline using simulated spectra processed to match Euclid ’s expected final data quality. Stacking enables robust recovery of key emission lines, including H α , H β , [O III ], and [N II ], below individual detection limits. However, the measurement of galaxy properties such as star formation rate, dust attenuation, and gas-phase metallicity are biased at stellar mass below log 10 ( M / M ⊙ )∼9 due to the flux-limited nature of Euclid spectroscopic samples, where spectra below the detection threshold lack reliable redshift measurements, preventing effective stacking. The star formation rate–stellar mass relation of the parent sample is recovered reliably only in the deep survey for log 10 ( M / M ⊙ )≳10, whereas the metallicity–mass relation is recovered more accurately over a wider mass range. These limitations are caused by the increased fraction of redshift measurement errors at lower masses and fluxes. We examined the impact of residual redshift contaminants that arises from mis-identified emission lines and noise spikes, on stacked spectra. Even after stringent quality selections, low-level contamination (&lt; 6%) has minimal impact on line fluxes due to the systematically weaker emission of contaminants. A percentile-based analysis of stacked spectra provides a sensitive diagnostic for detecting contamination via coherent spurious features at characteristic wavelengths. While our simulations include most instrumental effects, real Euclid data will require a further refinement of contamination mitigation strategies.

Topics

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 063 references
Metrics — AkademScholar · Coming soon