Skip to main content
Article

The <i>m</i> <sub>max</sub> - <i>M</i> <sub>ecl</sub> relation in the LEGUS clusters

Marie ZinnkannHelmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik, Universität BonnTereza JerabkovaDepartment of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk UniversityZhiqiang YanKey Laboratory of Modern Astronomy and Astrophysics (Nanjing University), Ministry of EducationPavel KroupaAstronomical Institute, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles UniversityYannik OstermannHelmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik, Universität BonnEda GjergoKey Laboratory of Modern Astronomy and Astrophysics (Nanjing University), Ministry of EducationAkram Hasani ZonooziDepartment of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS)Hosein HaghiDepartment of Physics, Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences (IASBS)Jan Pflamm-AltenburgHelmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik, Universität Bonn
ABI

Abstract

The relation between the maximum stellar mass in a very young cluster ( m max ) and the total stellar mass of the cluster ( M ecl ), known as the m max − M ecl relation, remains debated in the literature. To test the validity of this relation, we modelled young star clusters with masses between 10 2.5 and 10 5.0 M ⊙ and ages of 1–4 Myr using the galIMF code, in which stellar masses are optimally sampled from a varying initial stellar mass function. We compared the results with literature observations of extragalactic young star clusters. We incorporated stellar evolution via PARSEC and COLIBRI tracks and computed H α luminosities using the Pégase code. To account for dynamical ejections, we stochastically removed stars based on their spectral type, following previous N -body simulations. Additional sources of scatter, including uncertainties in age determination and contamination by field stars, were considered. Our results indicate that, under the assumptions explored here, optimal sampling is consistent with the extragalactic star cluster observations considered, whereas purely random sampling produces distributions that are not in agreement. These findings support a highly self-regulated interpretation of cluster formation in which stellar masses align optimally with the initial mass function rather than being drawn independently at random.

Topics

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 065 references