Skip to main content
Article

Meta Analysis of <scp>DHA</scp> and <scp>EPA</scp> Supplementation on Cardiovascular Outcomes and Atrial Fibrillation Risk

Sepideh Karkon ShayanSchool of Medicine Gonabad University of Medical Sciences Gonabad IranRosull Saadoon AbboodMedical Laboratory Techniques Department, College of Health and Medical Technology University of Al‐Maarif Anbar IraqSarah F. Al‐TaieDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Science University of Baghdad Baghdad IraqParia Ganji NatajSchool of Public Health Dalian Medical University Dalian ChinaMaksudova Malika KhamdamjonovnaDepartment of Faculty and Hospital Therapy No. 2, Nephrology and Hemodialysis Tashkent State Medical University Tashkent UzbekistanSiamak AminnezhadCardiovascular Research Center Tehran University of Medical Sciences Tehran IranYasaman Ghodsi BoushehriFaculty of Medicine Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Shiraz IranJabbarov Jamoliddin SindorovichDepartment of “Exact Sciences” Kimyo International University in Tashkent Branch Samarkand Samarkand UzbekistanAli SinehsepehrSchool of Medicine Golestan University of Medical Sciences Gorgan IranFarshad ZareStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz IranSeyed Abbas PakmehrSchool of Medicine Shiraz University of Medical Sciences Shiraz IranElham AbdollahiCardiovascular Research Center Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz IranMilad VahedinezhadCardiovascular Research Center Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran
ABI

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) remain to impose a main global burden of morbidity and mortality despite advances in anticipation and treatment. Omega-3 fatty acids, mainly eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), have been extensively studied for potential cardioprotective effects, yet their impact on cardiovascular outcomes remains debated due to heterogeneity in formulation, dose, and patient subgroups. This meta-analysis evaluated the effects of EPA and DHA supplementation on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and atrial fibrillation (AF), including postoperative AF (POAF), in patients with established CVD. A systematic search of Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science (January 2010-December 2021) identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of combined EPA + DHA supplementation in secondary prevention or perioperative settings. Data were synthesized using RevMan v5.3 with a random-effects model, and study quality was assessed via the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. From 3682 records, 25 RCTs (n = 25 578 patients) were included. Pooled analysis showed no significant reduction in MACE (effect estimate 0.042 ± 0.0499, Z = 0.850, 95% CI [-0.055, 0.140], p = 0.396; low heterogeneity) or AF/POAF incidence (trend toward reduction: -0.198 ± 0.1498, Z = -1.319, 95% CI [-0.491, 0.096], p = 0.187; modest heterogeneity). Neutral findings likely reflect moderate-dose combined EPA + DHA use, limited subgroup reporting on metabolic comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertriglyceridemia) or concomitant therapies (e.g., statins), and high background guideline-directed medical therapy reducing residual risk. Although omega-3 fatty acids exert anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, and lipid-modulating effects, this analysis indicates no broad benefit in reducing MACE or AF risk with combined moderate-dose EPA + DHA in heterogeneous post-event populations. Recent evidence highlights more MACE reductions with high-dose purified EPA monotherapy in high-metabolic-risk subgroups, balanced against dose-dependent AF increases at high doses (> 1.5 g/day). Future large-scale RCTs should prioritize biomarker-verified compliance, metabolic/concomitant therapy stratification, and formulation-specific comparisons to define targeted therapeutic roles. Trial Registration: This study has been registered in PROSPERO, and the registration code is 642795.

Topics

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 047 references