Skip to main content
Article

Resolution of the VII International Forum of Experts on Menopausal Hormone Therapy

Т.Ф. ТатарчукSI “Ukrainian Center of Maternity and Childhood of the NAMS of Ukraine”; National Medical University “Center for Innovative Medical Technologies of the NAS of Ukraine”, KyivН. Ю. ПедаченкоShupyk National University of Healthcare of Ukraine, KyivГ.О. ГребенніковаKazakhstan Association of Sexual and Reproductive Health, AlmatyО. Л. ГромоваO.O. Bogomolets National Medical University, KyivDilrabo KayumovaTashkent State Medical University, TashkentO. G. YashinaMedikom Clinic, KyivL. R. AgababyanSamarkand State Medical University, SamarkandЛ. М. БегимбековаKhoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, ShymkentФ.А. ГафуроваCenter for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers, TashkentM.A. GegechkoriZurab Sabahtarashvili Reproductive Clinic, TbilisiA.P. DzhaimbetovaKazakhstan Association of Sexual and Reproductive Health; UNFPA, AlmatyT. О. YermolenkoOdessa National Medical University, OdessaО. О. ЄфименкоSI “Ukrainian Center of Maternity and Childhood of the NAMS of Ukraine”, KyivGulsara EshimbetovaCenter for the Development of Professional Qualifications of Medical Workers, TashkentН. Ф. ЗахаренкоState National University “Center for Innovative Medical Technologies of the NAS of Ukraine”, KyivС.У. ІргашеваRepublican Specialized Scientific and Practical Medical Center for Maternal and Child Health, TashkentIrina L. KopobayevaNational Academy of Sciences «Karaganda Medical University»; Karaganda Branch of the KMPA, KaragandaН. В. КосейNational Medical University «Center for Innovative Medical Technologies of the NAS of Ukraine», KyivД. И. КристесашвилиCenter for Reproductive Medicine «Universi», TbilisiП.Н. МікаілзадеClinic «German», BakuГ Т МырзабековаCenter for Molecular Medicine, AlmatyР.О. МневецьSI “Ukrainian Center of Maternity and Childhood of the NAMS of Ukraine”; National Center “Institute of Biology and Medicine” of the Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, KyivS.D. MuratovaMirad Garriyev Turkmen State Medical University, AshgabatI.G. PersoyanBeglaryan Medical Center; Armenian Anti-Aging Medical Association, YerevanV. I. PyrogovaLviv National Medical University named after Danylo Halytsky, LvivН.М. РожковськаOdessa National Medical University, OdessaL.V. StavinskaNicolae Testemitsanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, ChisinauTalshyn UkybassovaNational Scientific Center for Motherhood and Childhood, Corporate fund “University Medical Center», Astana
ABI

Abstract

The VII International Forum of Experts on Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT) was held in Kyiv on November 18, 2025. The modern approach to the MHT prescription is not to resolve the issue of its appropriateness, but to choose the optimal form for a particular woman. Different routes of hormone administration have different pharmacokinetic properties and effects on metabolism, the coagulation system, and women’s somatic health. The recommendations of the European Menopause and Andropause Society emphasize the appropriateness of using combined MHT to improve the glycemic profile and delay the development of diabetes mellitus, with a preference for metabolically neutral progestogens – progesterone and dydrogesterone.Transdermal estrogens enter the systemic circulation directly, minimizing the effect on the liver and coagulation, which makes them the method of choice for women with an increased risk of venous thrombosis, obesity, or hypertriglyceridemia. At the same time, the effectiveness of transdermal MHT is characterized by significant interindividual variability.MHT is an effective antiresorptive method for the prevention of osteoporosis and fractures. Clinical studies demonstrate a significant increase in bone mineral density and a reduction in the risk of fractures with the use of MHT, particularly the combination of estradiol and dydrogesterone. Timely initiated MHT (within the first 10 years after menopause) is also associated with a decrease in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular complications, and neurodegenerative diseases. The individual choice of the form of MHT is a key factor in its safety and clinical efficacy.Particular attention should be paid to oncological safety, particularly the risk of breast cancer, when selecting MHT in patients using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system. Data from systematic reviews and meta-analyses indicate that the use of estrogens does not increase this risk, while it largely depends on the type of progestogen. Progesterone and dydrogesterone have the most favorable safety profile for the breast compared with synthetic gestagens, which is confirmed by the results of large-scale studies.Psychoemotional and sexual disorders (anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and decreased libido) are common in perimenopause and are largely due to systemic estrogen deficiency, which affects neurometabolic, vascular, and neuroendocrine homeostasis. The high frequency of these disorders justifies the need for comprehensive diagnostic assessment and individualized MHT in perimenopausal women.

Topics

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 00 references