Skip to main content
Article

Generative AI use, self-regulation, and Neuro-AI Pedagogical competence in higher education: a comparative study of undergraduate and graduate students in Uzbekistan

Dilnoza ZaripovaInformation and Educational Technologies, Tashkent University of Information Technologies Named After Muhammad al-KhwarizmiKudratjon ZohirovDepartment of Software and Technical Support of Computer Systems, Karshi State Technical UniversityNasibakhon RasulovaInformation and Educational Technologies, Tashkent University of Information Technologies Named After Muhammad al-KhwarizmiUmidjon KhayitovDepartment of Information Systems and Digital Technologies, Bukhara State UniversityDildora SaidovaDepartment of Chemistry, Bukhara State Pedagogical InstituteZavqiddin TemirovDepartment of Digital Technologies, Alfraganus UniversityRashid NasimovDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Tashkent State University of Economics
2026
ABI

Abstract

This study examines how full-time undergraduate and graduate students at a leading technical university in Uzbekistan engage with generative AI tools and how this relates to cognitive regulation, motivation, self-regulation, and ethical awareness. Using a quantitative exploratory design, an online survey was administered to 381 participants during the first (autumn) semester of the 2025–2026 academic year. A preliminarily screened 30-item instrument was developed across seven scales AI Use, Digital Attention, Cognitive Load, Motivation, Self-Regulation, Neuro-AI Pedagogical Competence, and Ethics and Academic Autonomy with internal consistency ranging from α = 0.717 to α = 0.895; content and discriminant validity have not yet been confirmed on independent samples. Group comparisons were conducted using Mann–Whitney U with Cohen's d on a balanced subsample ( n = 302; 151 per group), constructed to avoid confounding group-size asymmetry with substantive group differences. Significant between-group differences were found on six of seven scales ( p < .001): Ethics and Academic Autonomy (d = 1.47), AI Use (d = 1.29), Self-Regulation (d = 1.14), Neuro-AI Pedagogical Competence (d = 1.14), and Digital Attention (d = 0.99) showed large effects; Motivation showed a medium effect (d = 0.70). Cognitive load did not differ significantly ( p = .296). Multiple regression ( n = 372) identified Ethics and Academic Autonomy ( β = 0.446), Self-Regulation ( β = 0.279), and Motivation ( β = 0.178) as the strongest predictors of Neuro-AI Pedagogical Competence (R 2 = 0.799). The findings suggest that higher scores on Neuro-AI Pedagogical Competence were associated with stronger ethical awareness, self-regulation, and motivation, rather than with frequency of AI use. The study contributes empirical evidence from Central Asian higher education and supports the design of level-differentiated AI-integrated curricula.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 032 references