Skip to main content
Article

Multi-epoch afterglow rebrightenings in GRB 250129A: Evidence of successive shock interactions

D. AklCenter for Astrophysics and Space Science (CASS), New York University Abu DhabiS. AntierIJCLab, Univ Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3H. KoehnInstitute of Physics and Astronomy, Theoretical Astrophysics, University PotsdamP.T.H. PangInstitute for Gravitational and Subatomic Physics (GRASP), Utrecht UniversityJ. J. GengPurple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of SciencesR. GillInstituto de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro #8701, Ex-Hda. San José de la, Huerta, Morelia, MichoacánE. AbdikamalovEnergetic Cosmos Laboratory, Nazarbayev UniversityC. AdamiUniversité Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIMV. AivazyanE.Kharadze Georgian National Astrophysical Observatory, Mt. Kanobili, AbastumaniL. AlmeidaLaboratório Nacional de Astrofísica – LNA, Rua Estados UnidosS. AlshamsiAmerican University of Sharjah, Physics DepartmentC. AndradeSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of MinnesotaQ. AndréUniversité de la Côte d’AzurC. Angulo-ValdezInstituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-264J.-L. AtteiaInstitut de Recherche en Astrophysique et PlanétologieK. BarkaouiAstrobiology Research Unit, Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août 19CS. BasaAix Marseille Univ., CNRS, CNES, LAMR.L. BecerraInstituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-264P. BendjoyaUniversité Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, CNRS UMR 7293 Laboratoire LagrangeD. BerdikhanEnergetic Cosmos Laboratory, Nazarbayev UniversityE. BernaudAix Marseille Univ., CNRS, CNES, LAMS. BoissierAix Marseille Univ., CNRS, CNES, LAMS. BrunierUniversité Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, CNRS UMR 7293 Laboratoire LagrangeA. Y. BurdanovDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Science, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyN.R. ButlerSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State UniversityJ. J. ChenSchool of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Science and Technology of ChinaF. ColasLTE, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, Sorbonne Université, CNRSW. CorradiLaboratório Nacional de Astrofísica – LNA, Rua Estados UnidosM.W. CoughlinSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of MinnesotaD. DarsonÉcole Normale Supérieure - PSLT. DietrichInstitute of Physics and Astronomy, Theoretical Astrophysics, University PotsdamD. DornicAix-Marseille Univ., CNRS/IN2P3, Ctr. de Physique des Particules de MarseilleC. DouzetIJCLab, Univ Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3C. DuboisAix Marseille Univ., CNRS, CNES, LAMJ. G. DucoinAix-Marseille Univ., CNRS/IN2P3, Ctr. de Physique des Particules de MarseilleT. du LazCahill Center for Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, MC 249-17A. DurrouxUniversité de la Côte d’AzurD. DuttonDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillP.-A. DuverneUniversité Paris CitéF. DuxEuropean Southern ObservatoryE. G. ElhosseinyNational Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG)A. EsamdinUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesA.V. FilippenkoF. FortinUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-PyrénéesM. FreebergKNC, AAVSO, Hidden Valley Observatory(HVO), Colfax, WI.; iTelescope, UDROL. García-GarcíaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoM. GillonAstrobiology Research Unit, Université de Liège, Allée du 6 Août 19CN. GlobusInstituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, km 107 Carretera Tijuana-EnsenadaP. GokuldassDepartment of Physical Sciences, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityN. GuessoumAmerican University of Sharjah, Physics DepartmentP. HelloUniversité Paris-SaclayR. HellotKNC, AITPY. H. M. HendyNational Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG)Y. L. HuaPurple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of SciencesT. Hussenot-DesenongesUniversité Paris-SaclayR. InasaridzeE.Kharadze Georgian National Astrophysical Observatory, Mt. Kanobili, AbastumaniA. IskandarUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesM. JelínekASU – Astronomical Institute of the Czech Academy of SciencesS.N. KarpovFZU – Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 1999/2A. KlotzUniversité Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-PyrénéesN. KochiashviliE.Kharadze Georgian National Astrophysical Observatory, Mt. Kanobili, AbastumaniT. LaskarDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, University of UtahA. Le CallochSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of MinnesotaW. H. LeeInstituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-264S. LeoniniKNC, Montarrenti Observatory (C88)X. LiNational Astronomical ObservatoriesA. LienUniversity of TampaC. LimontaUniversité de la Côte d’AzurJ.K.K. LiuPhysics Department, Tsinghua UniversityD. López-CámaraInstituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-264F. MagnaniAix-Marseille Univ., CNRS/IN2P3, Ctr. de Physique des Particules de MarseilleJ. MaoYunnan Observatories, Chinese Academy of SciencesM. MašekFZU – Institute of Physics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 1999/2E. Moreno MéndezFacultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-264L. C. MenegazziMax Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (Albert Einstein Institute)W. MercierAix Marseille Univ., CNRS, CNES, LAMB.M. MihovInstitute of Astronomy and NAO, Bulgarian Academy of SciencesM. MolhamNational Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG)S. R. OatesDepartment of Physics, Lancaster UniversityM. OdehKNC, International Astronomical CenterH. PengPhysics Department, Tsinghua UniversityM. PereyraInstituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-264M. PillasSTAR Institute, Liege University, Allée du Six Août, 19CT. PradierUniversité de StrasbourgN.A. RakotondrainibeAix Marseille Univ., CNRS, CNES, LAMD. ReichartDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillJ.-P. RivetUniversité Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, CNRS UMR 7293 Laboratoire LagrangeF.D. RomanovKNC, American Association of Variable Star Observers (AAVSO)F. Sánchez-ÁlvarezInstituto de Astronomía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apartado Postal 70-264N. SasakiNEPA, Universidade do Estado do Amazonas (UEA)D. SchlekatDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillB. SchneiderAix Marseille Univ., CNRS, CNES, LAMA. SimonAstronomy and Space Physics Department, Taras Shevchenko National University of KyivL. Slavcheva-MihovaInstitute of Astronomy and NAO, Bulgarian Academy of SciencesR. StrausbaughPhysics Department, Eastern Illinois UniversityT.R. SunPurple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of SciencesA. TakeyNational Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG)M. TanasanNational Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand (NARIT)D. TurpinCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesA. de Ugarte PostigoAix Marseille Univ., CNRS, CNES, LAM
2026en
ABI

Abstract

Context. Most long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) exhibit afterglows that are broadly consistent with external forward-shock emission, which is typically described by smooth broken power-law decays in the multiband light curve. However, a minority of well-sampled GRBs deviates from this behavior, including the GRB we investigated, GRB 250129A. This source shows multiple late-time rebrightenings at X-ray and optical wavelengths. Rebrightenings are often attributed to energy injection from prolonged activity of the central engine, refreshed shocks from delayed shell collisions, density jumps in the ambient medium, or to the angular jet structure and viewing-angle effects. Aims After a comprehensive analysis of the prompt emission of the GRB observed in gamma rays and in the near-infrared, we investigated the physical origin of the multiple X-ray and optical flaring episodes observed in GRB 250129A. Methods. We conducted comprehensive temporal and spectral multiband analyses of GRB 250129A. The physical processes at play in the afterglow light curves were investigated using several methods, ranging from empirical fitting to Bayesian inference. The high-quality monitoring of the flare episodes, together with the connection between the prompt emission and the afterglow, enabled us to test the consistency of the fireball model and to constrain, reject, or confirm alternative scenarios. Results. GRB 250129A is an interesting GRB with multiwavelength prompt and afterglow emission. By conducting the prompt and time-resolved analyses, we obtained an isotropic-equivalent energy of E iso, γ = (1.35 ± 0.12)×10 53 erg. By modeling the afterglow using an agnostic Bayesian framework ( NMMA ), we ruled out a single external-shock evolution and a one-time energy-injection scenario. By further performing numerical calculations, we demonstrated that the rebrightening episodes are consistent with refreshed shocks arising from delayed collisions between relativistic shells. This agrees with evolving outflow dynamics. Conclusions. Based on the consistency between our analyses of the prompt and afterglow GRB 250129A data, together with prior general knowledge on microphysical properties, we find that two statistically significant rebrightening episodes occurred within 1.1 days post trigger and can be explained by a sequence of refreshed shocks. We stress that the availability of temporally and spectrally rich GRB datasets, such as the one we present here, provides a powerful means to test current modeling frameworks.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 0119 references