Skip to main content
Article

Biodiversity offsets and corporate environmental management: economic incentives for ecological restoration in agricultural landscapes

Sulieman Ibraheem Shelash Al-HawaryINTI – International University, MalaysiaAsokan VasudevanINTI – International University, MalaysiaM. I. Al-MaaitahAl-Ahliyya Amman University, JordanX. SolixovaTermez University of Economics and Service, UzbekistanDilnavoz ShavkidinovaTashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers, UzbekistanMansurbek XolmurotovTashkent State Agrarian University, UzbekistanA. NishonovTashkent State University of Law, UzbekistanM. XolovaTermez State Pedagogical Institute, UzbekistanZ. RuziyeviAbu Ali ibn Sino Bukhara State Medical Institute, UzbekistanM. UsmanovaSamarkand State Medical University, Uzbekistan
2026en
ABI

Abstract

Abstract Biodiversity offsetting has emerged as a principal policy mechanism to reconcile economic development with conservation goals, operating on the core assumption that ecological losses from development can be compensated through equivalent restoration elsewhere. However, the empirical relationship between the financial investment in these offsets and their actual ecological outcomes remains poorly understood, particularly in tropical regions that both development pressures and biodiversity are high. This study addresses this critical knowledge gap by conducting a comparative efficiency analysis of 6 biodiversity offset projects across Vietnam, Indonesia, and Malaysia from 2023 to 2025. We employed a dual-metric framework, integrating economic data on capital investment with biophysical measurements of habitat gain efficiency (hectares per 100,000 USD) and temporal connectivity indices. Our results show a counterintuitive but significant inverse relationship between investment scale and ecological efficiency. Projects with moderate funding achieved upto 20.7 hectares of habitat gain per 100KUSD, whereas the most heavily funded project achieved upto 20.7 hectares of habitat gain per 100KUSD, whereas the most heavily funded project yielded less than half that efficiency at 9.7 ha/100K USD. Statistical analysis confirms a strong negative correlation (Pearson's r = -0.72, p < 0.05), indicating diminishing marginal returns. Furthermore, habitat connectivity followed a non-linear maturation trajectory, typically requiring 3-5 years to approach optimal levels, challenging the linear timelines often assumed in offset policies. Regional performance disparities were substantial, with Vietnamese projects outperforming others by 42%, a difference strongly linked to governance coherence and adaptive management protocols.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 017 references