Skip to main content
Article

Euclid preparation

F. FinelliINFN-BolognaY. AkramiCERCA/ISO, Department of Physics, Case Western Reserve UniversityA.A. AndrewsINFN-BolognaM. BallardiniIstituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di FerraraS. CasasInstitute for Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology (TTK), RWTH Aachen UniversityD. KaragiannisDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of the Western Cape, BellvilleZ. SakrInstitut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie (IRAP), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, CNESJ. ValiviitaDepartment of PhysicsG. AlestasInstituto de Física Teórica UAM-CSIC, Campus de CantoblancoN. BartoloDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “G. Galilei”, Università di PadovaJ. R. Bermejo-ClimentInstituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía LácteaS. NesserisInstituto de Física Teórica UAM-CSIC, Campus de CantoblancoD. PaolettiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaD. SaponeDepartamento de Física, FCFM, Universidad de ChileI. TutusausUniversité Toulouse III - Paul SabatierA. AchúcarroInstitute Lorentz, Leiden UniversityG. Cañas-HerreraEuropean Space Agency/ESTECJ. JascheInstitut d’Astrophysique de ParisG. LavauxInstitut d'Astrophysique de ParisN. AghanimInstitut d'Astrophysique SpatialeB. AltieriESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del CastilloA. AmaraSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of SurreyL. AmendolaHeidelberg Institute for Theoretical StudiesS. AndreonINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di BreraN. AuricchioINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaC. BaccigalupiINFN, Sezione di TriesteD. BagotCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales – Centre spatial de ToulouseM. BaldiUniversity of BolognaS. BardelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaP. BattagliaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaA. BivianoIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseE. BranchiniINFN-Sezione di GenovaM. BresciaDepartment of Physics “E. Pancini”, University Federico IIS. CameraINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoV. CapobiancoINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoC. CarboneINAF-IASF MilanoJ. CarreteroCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)M. CastellanoNational Institute for AstrophysicsG. CastignaniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. CavuotiNaples Anesthesia & Physician AssociatesK. C. ChambersInstitute for Astronomy, University of HawaiiA. CimattiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaC. Colodro-CondeInstituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía LácteaG. CongedoInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal ObservatoryC. J. ConseliceJodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of ManchesterL. ConversiEuropean Space Agency/ESRINY. CopinUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822F. CourbinInstitut de Ciències del Cosmos (ICCUB), Universitat de Barcelona (IEEC-UB)H. M. CourtoisLyon CollegeM. CropperMullard Space Science Laboratory, University College LondonA. R. Costa SilvaInstituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo GrandeH. DegaudenziDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaS. de la TorreAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAMG. De LuciaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteA. M. Di GiorgioINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiH. DoleInstitut d'Astrophysique SpatialeM. DouspisUniversité Paris-SaclayF. DubathDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaC. A. J. DuncanUniversity of EdinburghX. DupacESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del CastilloS. DusiniINFN-PadovaS. EscoffierCentre de physique des particules de MarseilleM. FarinaINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiR. FarinelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaF. FaustiniINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaS. FerriolUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822P. FosalbaInstitute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UABM. FrailisINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteE. FranceschiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaM. FumanaINAF-IASF MilanoS. GaleottaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteK. GeorgeUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenB. GillisUniversity of EdinburghC. GiocoliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaJ. Gracia-CarpioMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsA. GrazianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di PadovaF. GruppMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsS. V. H. HauganInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of OsloW. HolmesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyI. M. HookDepartment of Physics, Lancaster UniversityF. HormuthFelix Hormuth EngineeringA. HornstrupTechnical University of DenmarkK. JahnkeMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieM. JhabvalaNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterB. JoachimiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College LondonE. KeihänenDepartment of PhysicsS. KermicheCentre de physique des particules de MarseilleA. KiesslingJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyB. KubikUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822M. KümmelUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenM. KunzLaboratoire de Physique ThéoriqueH. Kurki-SuonioDepartment of PhysicsA. M. C. Le BrunUniversité Paris Sciences et LettresS. LigoriINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoP. B. LiljeInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of OsloV. LindholmDepartment of PhysicsI. LloroSKA Observatory, Jodrell Bank, Lower WithingtonG. MainettiCentre de Calcul de l’IN2P3/CNRSD. MainoINAF-IASF MilanoE. MaioranoINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna
2026
ABI

Abstract

Context. The Euclid mission of the European Space Agency will deliver galaxy and cosmic shear surveys, which will be used to constrain initial conditions and statistics of primordial fluctuations. Aims. We present highlights for the Euclid scientific capability to test initial conditions beyond Λ cold dark matter with the three-dimensional galaxy clustering from the spectroscopic survey, the tomographic approach to 3 × 2pt statistics from photometric galaxy survey, and their combination. We then present how these Euclid results can be enhanced when combined with current and future measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies. Methods. We provide Fisher forecasts from the combination of Euclid spectroscopic and photometric surveys for spatial curvature, running of the spectral index of the power spectrum of curvature perturbations, isocurvature perturbations, and primordial features. For the parameters of these models, we also provide the combination of Euclid forecasts (pessimistic and optimistic) with three different CMB specifications, i.e. Planck , the Simons Observatory (SO), and CMB-S4. We provide Fisher forecasts for how the power spectrum and bispectrum from the Euclid spectroscopic survey will constrain the local, equilateral, and orthogonal shapes of primordial non-Gaussianity. We also review how Bayesian field-level inference of primordial non-Gaussianity can constrain local primordial non-Gaussianity. Results. We find that the combination of the Euclid main probes will provide an uncertainty of σ (Ω K ) = 0.0044 (0.003) at a 68% confidence level (CL) in pessimistic (optimistic) settings, assuming flat spatial sections as fiducial cosmology. We also find that the combination of the Euclid main probes can detect the running of the scalar spectral index for the fiducial value α s = −0.01 with approximately 2 σ (4 σ ) uncertainty and provide the uncertainty of σ ( α s ) = 0.004 (0.0015) for the fiducial value α s = −0.001 at a 68% CL, always with pessimistic (optimistic) settings. We show how Euclid will have the capability to provide constraints on isocurvature perturbations with a blue spectral index that are one order of magnitude tighter than current bounds. For primordial non-Gaussianity, the combined power spectrum and bispectrum Fisher forecast for the Euclid spectroscopic survey leads to σ ( f NL local ) = 2.2, σ ( f NL equil ) = 108, and σ ( f NL ortho ) = 33 by assuming k max = 0.15 h Mpc −1 and universality for the halo mass function. We show how Bayesian field-level inference can reach the combined power spectrum and bispectrum Fisher forecast uncertainty on f NL local at these large scales, although it is more conservative as it is based on more realistic three-dimensional mock data and masks. For the Euclid main probes, we find relative errors on the amplitude of primordial oscillations (with a fiducial value of 0.01), of 21% (18%) for linear frequency and of 22% (18%) for logarithmic frequency at a 68% CL in the pessimistic (optimistic) case. These uncertainties can be further improved by adding the information from the bispectrum and the non-linear reconstruction. Conclusions. We show how Euclid , with its unique combination of three-dimensional galaxy clustering from the spectroscopic survey and 3 × 2pt statistics from the photometric survey, will provide the tightest constraints on low redshift to date. By targeting a markedly different range in redshift and scale, Euclid ’s expected uncertainties are complementary to those obtained by CMB primary anisotropy, returning the tightest combined constraints on the physics of the early Universe.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 0234 references