Skip to main content
Article

Neanderthal’s heel: How the Neanderthal’s external calcaneal shape uniquely differs from that of modern humans

Rita SorrentinoUniversity of BolognaSilvia VolpeDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, 40126, ItalyKristian J. CarlsonDivision of Integrative Anatomical Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90033, USA; Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, WITS 2050, South AfricaTeresa NicolosiDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, 40126, Italy; Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Ravenna, 48121, ItalyCarla FigusDepartment of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Ravenna, 48121, ItalyVitale SparacelloDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Monserrato, Cagliari, 09124, ItalyFrancesca MeliDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Palermo, 90123, ItalyMichele ConconiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Health Sciences and Technologies, Interdepartmental Centre for Industrial Research (HST-ICIR), University of Bologna, Bologna, 40136, ItalyNicola SancisiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Health Sciences and Technologies, Interdepartmental Centre for Industrial Research (HST-ICIR), University of Bologna, Bologna, 40136, ItalyClaudio BelvedereLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Functional Evaluation of Prostheses, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, 40136, ItalyAlberto LeardiniLaboratory of Movement Analysis and Functional Evaluation of Prostheses, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, 40136, ItalyJean-Jacques HublinChaire Internationale de Paléoanthropologie, CIRB (UMR 7241-U1050), Collège de France, Paris, 75005, France; Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 04103, GermanyTimothy RyanDepartment of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, 16802, USALuca SìneoDepartment of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), University of Palermo, Palermo, 90123, ItalyAntonio RosasGroup of Paleoanthropology, Department of Palaeobiology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC), Madrid, 28006, SpainStefano BenazziDepartment of Cultural Heritage, University of Bologna, Ravenna, 48121, Italy; Department of Archaeology, Samarkand State University named after Sharof Rashidov, Boulevard 15, Samarkand, 140129, UzbekistanMaria Giovanna BelcastroDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, 40126, Italy
2026en
ABI

Abstract

Neanderthals exhibit unique morphological adaptations in their calcaneus compared to Homo sapiens, shedding light on distinct evolutionary pressures and functional requirements shaping their respective foot anatomy. This study assesses which calcaneal traits represent plesiomorphic, autapomorphic, and/or functional adaptations. Geometric morphometrics was used to analyze the external shape of 7 Neanderthal and 64 H. sapiens calcanei spanning early Upper Pleistocene hunter-gatherers to postindustrial populations. Shape, size, and allometric differences were assessed among groups, enabling detailed examination of the whole calcaneus and key subregions such as talar facets, the cuboid facet, and the tuberosity. Compared to calcanei of H. sapiens, calcanei of Neanderthals were shorter, wider, and taller-distinct adaptations likely favoring more load-bearing over the rearfoot and high mobility. Similar but less pronounced traits appear in highly mobile, unshod modern humans, while sedentary, postindustrial populations show more gracile calcanei, likely influenced by footwear and reduced activity. Neanderthals also displayed ancestral features such as a shorter sinus tarsi. Notably, Neanderthal subtalar joint shape and calcaneocuboid orientation suggest a habitually pronated foot posture. Neanderthals also exhibit a reduced lateral plantar process compared to H. sapiens, implicating differences in plantar ligament attachment and foot arch support. Differences in the cuboid facet and tuberosity of Neanderthals and H. sapiens imply alternative strategies for foot stabilization and force transmission through proximal tarsal joints, likely reflecting a different longitudinal arch expression, one adapted to Neanderthals' body mass and high-activity lifestyle.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 0113 references