Skip to main content
Article

Euclid preparation

R. IngraoIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseM. CostanziIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseT. CastroINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteA. SaroICSC – Centro Nazionale di Ricerca in High Performance Computing, Big Data e Quantum ComputingS. BorganiDipartimento di Fisica – Sezione di Astronomia, Università di TriesteLucie BaumontIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseM. AguenaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteC. MurrayUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Astroparticule et CosmologieS BhargavaUniversité Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, CNRSS. GrandisUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Astro- und TeilchenphysikE. MunariINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteB. AltieriESAC/ESAS. AndreonINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di BreraN. AuricchioINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaC. BaccigalupiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteMarco BaldiINFN-Sezione di BolognaS. BardelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaP. BattagliaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaA. BivianoIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseE. BranchiniINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di BreraM. BresciaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di CapodimonteS. CameraINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoV. CapobiancoINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoC. CarboneINAF-IASF MilanoJ. CarreteroCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)M. CastellanoNational Institute for AstrophysicsG. CastignaniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. CavuotiNaples Anesthesia & Physician AssociatesA CimattiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaC Colodro-CondeInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasG. CongedoUniversity of EdinburghL. ConversiESAC/ESAY. CopinCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueF. CourbinInstitut de Ciències del Cosmos (ICCUB), Universitat de Barcelona (IEEC-UB)H. M. CourtoisInstitut de Physique des 2 Infinis de LyonH. DegaudenziDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaG. De LuciaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteF. DubathDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaX DupacESAC/ESAS. EscoffierAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMM. FarinaINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiR FarinelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. FarrensAstrophysique, Instrumentation et ModélisationS. FerriolUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822F. Finelli⋆INAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaP. FosalbaInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Edifici RDIT, Campus UPCM. FrailisINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteE. FranceschiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaM. FumanaINAF-IASF MilanoKoshy GeorgeB. GillisUniversity of EdinburghC. GiocoliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaJ. Gracia-CarpioMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsA. GrazianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di PadovaF GruppUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenS. V. H. HauganInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of OsloShoubaneh HemmatiHenk HoekstraLeiden Observatory, Leiden UniversityW. HolmesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyF. HormuthFelix Hormuth EngineeringA. HornstrupCosmic Dawn Center (DAWN)K. JahnkęMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieM. JhabvalaNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterB. JoachimiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College LondonS. KermicheAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMA. KiesslingJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyB. KubikUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822H. Kurki‐SuonioDepartment of PhysicsA. M. C. Le BrunSorbonne UniversitéS. LigoriINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoP. B. LiljeInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of OsloV. LindholmDepartment of PhysicsI. LloroSKAOM. MagliocchettiINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiG. MainettiCentre de Calcul de l’IN2P3/CNRSE. MaioranoINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaO. MansuttiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteO. MarggrafUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für AstronomieM. MartinelliINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaN. MartinetAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAMF. MarulliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaR. MasseyN. MauriINFN-Sezione di BolognaS. MaurogordatoUniversité Côte d’Azur, Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur, CNRSE. MedinaceliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. MeiCNRS-UCB International Research Laboratory, Centre Pierre Binétruy, IRL2007M. MeneghettiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaE. MerlinINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di PadovaG. MeylanInstitute of Physics, Laboratory of Astrophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Observatoire de SauvernyPierluigi MonacoIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseA. MoraTelespazio UK S.L. for European Space Agency (ESA)M. MorescoDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaClaudio MorettiINFN, Sezione di TriesteL. MoscardiniDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaC. T. MpethaNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterC. NeissnerPort d’Informació CientíficaS.-M. NiemiEuropean Space Research and Technology CentreC PadillaInstitut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Campus UABS. PaltaniDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaF. PasianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste
2026en
ABI

Abstract

We present CosmoPostProcess , a simulation-based forward model algorithm calibrated to reproduce optical cluster observables in line with measurements taken with the Euclid space telescope. The main deliverable of CosmoPostProcess is a correction for stacked surface-density profiles, binned in terms of richness and redshift, that accounts for selection-related systematic effects. These corrections take into account the modification to the stacked weak lensing signal from richness-selected samples of clusters identified in the photometric Euclid survey compared with an unbiased reference sample. In this work, we focus on the Euclid richness definition currently foreseen for the cosmological analysis, which does not apply a colour selection. Euclid also provides an alternative richness estimate based on a red-sequence galaxy selection, which is not considered here. The algorithm processes N -body simulations by painting galaxies with a halo-occupation model and emulating the survey’s detection and richness-assignment algorithms. We implemented a novel algorithm to estimate the optical cluster centres from galaxy-projected densities and validated it against the official Euclid pipelines. The effect of baryonic physics on the halo density profiles is incorporated through a correction calibrated on hydrodynamical simulations, yielding total-matter profiles consistent with those measured in the reference hydrodynamical simulations. In validation against hydrodynamical simulations, the baryon-corrected excess surface density is in agreement to within 2% for cluster-centric radii, r ∈ [0.1, 5] h −1 Mpc. To assess the impact of the different contributions to the selection bias, we performed dedicated tests that included variations of both cosmological parameters and the parameters of the mass–richness relation. Across all these tests, the selection bias induced by projection alone follows a robust pattern: a large-scale structure that is physically correlated with the main halo and projected along the line of sight enhances the stacked surface density profile near the transition from one-halo to two-halo dominance, with a peak radius of about 1 h −1 Mpc and an amplitude of about 20–40%, with a dependence on richness and redshift. This behaviour is mild at low and intermediate redshifts ( z ≲ 0.7), where the impact remains at the level of a few per cent, but it becomes increasingly relevant at higher redshift ( z ≳ 0.7), with a more pronounced enhancement of the transition-scale peak. Finally, baryonic modifications remain sub-dominant outside the core, with an impact of about 2% beyond r ≳ 0.3 h −1 Mpc. As an outcome of this analysis, the CosmoPostProcess framework delivers radial profile corrections with associated uncertainties, combining the selection bias from projection effects with the impact of baryonic physics and miscentring. These corrections will be a key ingredient to ensure controlled systematics in the Euclid DR1 galaxy cluster cosmological analysis.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 099 references