Skip to main content
Article

Euclid preparation

G. PapiniDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaO. CucciatiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaM. BolzonellaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. ContariniMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsS. SartoriAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMKatarina KraljicUniversité de Strasbourg, CNRS, Observatoire astronomique de Strasbourg, UMR 7550C. M. CorreaMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsP VielzeufAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMG. De LuciaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteAlice PisaniCentre de physique des particules de MarseilleJ. G. SorceInstitut d'Astrophysique SpatialeM. MagliocchettiINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiC. SchimdINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteFabio FontanotIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseE SarpaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteL. PozzettiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaA EniaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaE. PouyerAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAMMichaela HirschmannInstitute of Physics, Laboratory for Galaxy Evolution, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Observatoire de SauvernyM. SpinelliUniversity of the Western CapeLizhi XieTianjin Normal UniversityG. ZamoraniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaMichele FumagalliINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteMatteo FossatiDipartimento di Fisica “G. Occhialini”, Università degli Studi di Milano BicoccaM. AubertUniversité Clermont AuvergnePetra AwadLeiden Observatory, Leiden UniversityAllison W. S. ManDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British ColumbiaAndrás KovácsKonkoly Observatory, HUN-REN CSFK, MTA Centre of ExcellenceK. V. NedkovaB. AltieriESAC/ESAA AmaraSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Surrey, GuildfordS. AndreonINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di BreraN. AuricchioINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaC. BaccigalupiSISSA, International School for Advanced StudiesMarco BaldiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. BardelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaP. BattagliaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaA. BivianoIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseE. BranchiniDipartimento di Fisica, Università di GenovaM. BresciaDepartment of Physics “E. Pancini”, University Federico IIS. CameraINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoV. CapobiancoINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoC. CarboneINAF-IASF MilanoV. F. CardoneNational Institute for AstrophysicsJ. CarreteroCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)Santiago CasasInstitute for Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology (TTK), RWTH Aachen UniversityM. CastellanoNational Institute for AstrophysicsG. CastignaniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. CavuotiNaples Anesthesia & Physician AssociatesK. C. ChambersInstitute for Astronomy, University of HawaiiA CimattiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaC Colodro-CondeInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasG. CongedoInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal ObservatoryL. ConversiEuropean Space Agency/ESRINY. CopinUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822A. CostilleAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAMF. CourbinInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA)H. M. CourtoisInstitut de Physique des 2 Infinis de LyonM. CropperMullard Space Science Laboratory, University College LondonA. Da SilvaInstituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de LisboaH. DegaudenziDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaS. de la TorreAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAMH. DoleUniversité Paris-SaclayF. DubathDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaX DupacESAC/ESAS. DusiniINFN-PadovaS. EscoffierAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMM. FarinaINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiS. FarrensAstrophysique, Instrumentation et ModélisationS FerriolCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueF. Finelli⋆INFN-BolognaP. FosalbaInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Edifici RDIT, Campus UPCS. FotopoulouSchool of Physics, HH Wills Physics Laboratory, University of BristolN. FourmanoitAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMM. FrailisINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteE. FranceschiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaM. FumanaINAF-IASF MilanoS. GaleottaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteKoshy GeorgeB. GillisInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal ObservatoryC. GiocoliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaJ. Gracia-CarpioMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsA. GrazianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di PadovaF GruppUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenS. V. H. HauganInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of OsloW. HolmesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyF. HormuthFelix Hormuth EngineeringA. HornstrupTechnical University of DenmarkK. JahnkęMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieM. JhabvalaNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterB. JoachimiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College LondonS. KermicheAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMA. KiesslingJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyB. KubikCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueM KümmelUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenM. KunzUniversité de Genève, Département de Physique Théorique and Centre for Astroparticle PhysicsH. Kurki‐SuonioDepartment of PhysicsA. M. C. Le BrunUniversité Paris Sciences et LettresS. LigoriINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoP. B. LiljeInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo
2026en
ABI

Abstract

The evolution of galaxies is profoundly influenced by the environment they reside in. Cosmic voids, the most underdense regions of the Universe, serve as pristine laboratories for studying galaxy evolution in the relative absence or weaker influence of the complex physical processes that dominate denser environments. We investigate the properties and merger histories of galaxies as a function of environment using the GAlaxy Evolution and Assembly (GAEA) mock-observation light cone, which replicates the Euclid Deep Survey as foreseen at the epoch of the first data release. The H α -selected galaxy sample spans the redshift range 0.4 < z < 1.8, corresponding to the interval over which H α is accessible to Euclid slitless spectroscopy. We classified galaxies based on their void-centric distance and local density contrast. We compared their stellar masses, specific star formation rates, bulge-to-total stellar mass ratios, and halo masses across different environments, while controlling for the dependence on stellar mass of the other intrinsic properties. We further analysed the merger histories of these galaxies to study their assembly evolution. We find that galaxies located closer to void centres ( d cc ≲ 0.7 R v ) are generally less massive, more actively star-forming, and more disc-dominated than galaxies in denser regions, with their distributions statistically distinct at more than 4 σ confidence according to Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests. Merger histories indicate that void galaxies do not experience fewer mergers but that these occur later, leading to stellar mass assembly delayed by approximately 0.5–1 Gyr relative to galaxies in high-density regions. This supports a scenario in which the environment regulates the timing and nature of mergers rather than their overall frequency, producing a slower evolutionary path in low-density regions. We conclude by discussing the extent to which these trends are shaped by environmental parametrisation methods and observational selection effects. Our analysis provides a framework for interpreting forthcoming Euclid data and demonstrates that Euclid will enable the identification of cosmic voids and characterisations of their galaxy populations with an unprecedented statistical power and redshift coverage, providing a quantitative forecast of Euclid ’s capability to probe environmental effects on galaxy evolution.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 0138 references