Skip to main content
Article

Euclid preparation

B. Camacho QuevedoInstitute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UABM. CrocceInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Edifici RDIT, Campus UPCM. Pellejero IbañezInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal ObservatoryRaúl E. AnguloDonostia International Physics Center (DIPC)A. PezzottaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di BreraAlexander EggemeierUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für AstronomieG. GambardellaInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Edifici RDIT, Campus UPCClaudio MorettiIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseE. SefusattiIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseAzadeh Moradinezhad DizgahUniversité Savoie Mont BlancE. GaztañagaInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Edifici RDIT, Campus UPCMatteo ZennaroDepartment of Physics, Oxford UniversityM. -A. BretonUniversité Paris-SaclayA. ChudaykinLaboratoire de Physique ThéoriqueGiacomo D’AmicoDipartimento di Scienze Matematiche, Fisiche e Informatiche, Università di ParmaVincent DesjacquesTechnion Israel Institute of TechnologyS. de la TorreAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAMP. FosalbaInstitute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UABM. GuidiUniversity of BolognaM. KärcherDipartimento di Fisica “Aldo Pontremoli”, Università degli Studi di MilanoKevin PardedeC. PorcianiUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für AstronomieA. PugnoUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für AstronomieJ. SalvalaggioIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseE SarpaICSC – Centro Nazionale di Ricerca in High Performance Computing, Big Data e Quantum ComputingA. VeropalumboINFN-Sezione di GenovaB. AltieriESAC/ESAS. AndreonINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di BreraN. AuricchioINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaC. BaccigalupiSISSA, International School for Advanced StudiesMarco BaldiUniversity of BolognaS. BardelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaR. BenderMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsA. BivianoIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseE. BranchiniINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di BreraM. BresciaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di CapodimonteS. CameraINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoV. CapobiancoINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoC. CarboneINAF-IASF MilanoV. F. CardoneINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di RomaJ. CarreteroCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)Santiago CasasInstitute for Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology (TTK), RWTH Aachen UniversityF. J. CastanderInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Edifici RDIT, Campus UPCM. CastellanoNational Institute for AstrophysicsG. CastignaniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. CavuotiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di CapodimonteK. C. ChambersInstitute for Astronomy, University of HawaiiA CimattiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaC. Colodro-CondeInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasG. CongedoUniversity of EdinburghL. ConversiEuropean Space Agency/ESRINY. CopinCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueF. CourbinInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Edifici RDIT, Campus UPCH. M. CourtoisLyon CollegeH. DegaudenziDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaG. De LuciaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteH. DoleInstitut d'Astrophysique SpatialeM. DouspisUniversité Paris-SaclayF. DubathDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaC. A. J. DuncanUniversity of EdinburghX DupacESAC/ESAS. DusiniINFN-PadovaS. EscoffierAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMM. FarinaINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiR FarinelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. FarrensCEA Paris-SaclayS. FerriolCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueF. Finelli⋆INAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. FotopoulouSchool of Physics, HH Wills Physics Laboratory, University of BristolN. FourmanoitAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMM. FrailisINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteE. FranceschiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaM. FumanaINAF-IASF MilanoS. GaleottaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteKoshy GeorgeB. GillisInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal ObservatoryC. GiocoliINFN-Sezione di BolognaJ. Gracia-CarpioMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsA. GrazianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di PadovaF GruppUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenL. GuzzoDipartimento di Fisica “Aldo Pontremoli”, Università degli Studi di MilanoS. V. H. HauganInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of OsloW. HolmesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyF. HormuthFelix Hormuth EngineeringA. HornstrupTechnical University of DenmarkK. JahnkęMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieB. JoachimiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College LondonS. KermicheAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMA. KiesslingJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyB. KubikCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueM KümmelUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenM. KunzUniversité de Genève, Département de Physique Théorique and Centre for Astroparticle PhysicsH. Kurki‐SuonioDepartment of PhysicsA. M. C. Le BrunUniversité Paris Sciences et LettresS. LigoriINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoP. B. LiljeInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of OsloV. LindholmDepartment of PhysicsI. LloroSKAOG. MainettiCentre de Calcul de l’IN2P3/CNRSE. MaioranoINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna
2026en
ABI

Abstract

Accurate modelling of redshift-space distortions (RSDs) is essential for maximising the cosmological information extracted from large galaxy redshift surveys. In preparation for the forthcoming analysis of the Euclid spectroscopic data, we investigated three approaches to modelling RSD effects on the power spectrum multipoles of mock H α emission line galaxies. We focused on two one-loop perturbation theory models – the effective field theory (EFT) and velocity difference generator (VDG ∞ ) – that differ in their treatment of the real-to-redshift space mapping on small scales and a third approach, the BACCO emulator, that adopts a hybrid strategy combining perturbation theory with high-resolution N -body simulations. We assessed the ability of these models to recover key cosmological parameters, including the expansion rate h , the cold dark matter density parameter ω c , and the scalar amplitude A s across four redshift bins spanning 0.9 ≤ z ≤ 1.8. In each bin, we found that VDG ∞ and BACCO outperform the EFT model across all scales up to k max ≲ 0.35 h Mpc −1 . While BACCO saturates in constraining power at intermediate scales and higher redshift, the VDG ∞ model continues to improve parameter constraints beyond k max ≳ 0.30 h Mpc −1 . The EFT model, although robust on large scales, exhibits significant parameter biases for k max ≳ 0.25 h Mpc −1 , limiting its applicability to Euclid -like H α samples. Among the full perturbation theory-based models, the enhanced treatment of small-scale effects of RSDs in VDG ∞ improves cosmological parameter constraints by up to a factor of two.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 0105 references