Skip to main content
Article

Synthetic Biology and Soft Robotics in Biohybrid Kidney Replacement: A Conceptual Framework and Translational Roadmap

Amr Ali Mohamed Abdelgawwad El‐SehrawyInternal Medicine, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism Mansoura University Mansoura EgyptZeina T. KhaleelDepartment of Pharmacy Al‐Mustafa University Baghdad IraqR.R. Gafarov GafarovDepartment of Urology Samarkand State Medical University Samarkand UzbekistanNisar Ahmad KokaDepartment of English, College of Languages and Translation King Khalid University Abha Kingdom of Saudi ArabiaMirza R. BaigDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy Dubai Medical University Dubai UAEShrey Kumar SrivastavDepartment of General Medicine Sharda University Greater Noida IndiaSarmad salam abdullahDepartment of Pharmacy Al‐Mustafa University Baghdad IraqMajid S. JabirCollege of Applied Sciences University of Technology Baghdad IraqNeeraj BainsalUniversity Institute of Pharma Sciences, Chandigarh University Mohali Punjab IndiaAseel SmeratHourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al‐Ahliyya Amman University Amman Jordan
2026en
ABI

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease necessitates safer, more continuous kidney replacement therapies (KRT), yet current dialysis and transplantation are constrained by intermittent treatment, organ scarcity, and immunosuppression-related complications. METHODS: This conceptual narrative review examines the potential integration of synthetic biology and soft robotics within a biohybrid KRT framework. We define a cyborg nephron as an engineered functional unit coupling living renal/vascular cells with compliant mechanical and fluidic interfaces, organized as a Modular Renal Assist Device (MRAD) with separable filtration, tubular transport, endocrine support, and control modules. Technology readiness levels (TRL) were applied to distinguish established, preclinical, and conceptual components. RESULTS: Available evidence supports several individual components including cell-based renal bioreactors, microphysiological models, endothelialized blood-contacting surfaces, passive membranes, soft micropumps, and wireless sensing (TRL 3-5). Conversely, autonomous renal gene circuits, active immunoisolation, durable vascular integration, and fully implanted closed-loop control remain predominantly preclinical or conceptual (TRL 1-2). Major barriers include thrombosis, oxygen delivery, cell maturation, genetic stability, mechanical fatigue, power demands, cybersecurity, and regulation of combined living-device products. CONCLUSIONS: The cyborg nephron represents a hypothesis-generating research framework rather than a near-term clinical solution. Staged validation through modular development, conservative safety design, and comparison with simpler alternatives is essential before integrated preclinical testing can be justified.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 0100 references