Skip to main content
Preprint

Modes of action for biological control of Botrytis cinerea by antagonistic bacteria

Rana HaidarUMRSV - Unité Mixte de Recherche en Santé Végétale (INRA/ENITA) (ISVV - IFR103 Centre de Recherche INRA Bordeaux Aquitaine 71, Avenue Edouard Bourleaux BP 81, 33883 Villenave d'Ornon Cedex - France)Marc FermaudUMRSV - Unité Mixte de Recherche en Santé Végétale (INRA/ENITA) (ISVV - IFR103 Centre de Recherche INRA Bordeaux Aquitaine 71, Avenue Edouard Bourleaux BP 81, 33883 Villenave d'Ornon Cedex - France)Carlos Calvo‐GarridoUMRSV - Unité Mixte de Recherche en Santé Végétale (INRA/ENITA) (ISVV - IFR103 Centre de Recherche INRA Bordeaux Aquitaine 71, Avenue Edouard Bourleaux BP 81, 33883 Villenave d'Ornon Cedex - France)Jean RoudetUnité mixte de recherche ŒnologieAlain DeschampsUMRSV - Unité Mixte de Recherche en Santé Végétale (INRA/ENITA) (ISVV - IFR103 Centre de Recherche INRA Bordeaux Aquitaine 71, Avenue Edouard Bourleaux BP 81, 33883 Villenave d'Ornon Cedex - France)
2016en
ABI

Abstract

The role of beneficial bacteria in biocontrol of plant diseases, particularly those caused by the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea, has been investigated by testing many bacteria under laboratory and field conditions. Bacteria may protect plants against B. cinerea by direct antagonistic interactions between biocontrol agents and this pathogen, as well as indirect effects through the induction of host resistance. This review focuses on various bacteria that act as biological control agents (BCAs) of B. cinerea and their associated mechanisms. The modes of action (MoAs) include: i) synthesis of anti-fungal metabolites, such as antibiotics, cell wall-degrading enzymes and volatile organic compounds (VOCs); ii) competition for nutrients and/or a niche; and iii) induction of host resistance. The challenge for development of BCAs is to reduce the variability of efficiency and to prove persistence under a large range of conditions. We discuss the advantages and drawbacks of MoA for future applications of bacteria in the field and in post-harvest storage, as well as combination of different MoAs as a strategy to achieve a more regular efficacy.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 20 references