Skip to main content
Article

Cosmological parameter analysis including SDSS Ly<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:math>forest and galaxy bias: Constraints on the primordial spectrum of fluctuations, neutrino mass, and dark energy

Uroš SeljakInternational Center for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy;A. MakarovPhysics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USAPatrick McDonaldPhysics Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USAScott F. AndersonAstronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USANeta A. BahcallPrinceton University Observatory, Princeton, New JerseyJ. BrinkmannScott BurlesDept. of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USARenyue CenPrinceton University Observatory, Princeton, New JerseyMamoru DoiInstitute of Astronomy, School of Science, University of Tokyo, JapanJames E. GunnPrinceton University Observatory, Princeton, New JerseyŽeljko IvezićAstronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USAS. KentFermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia,Illinois 60510, USAJ. LovedayUniversity of Sussex, Sussex, United KingdomRobert H. LuptonPrinceton University Observatory, Princeton, New JerseyJeffrey A. MunnU.S. Naval Observatory,Flagstaff Station, Flagstaff, Arizona 86002-1149, USAR. C. NicholInstitute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United KingdomJeremiah P. OstrikerInstitute of Astronomy, Cambrdige University, Cambridge, United KingdomDavid J. SchlegelPrinceton University Observatory, Princeton, New JerseyDonald P. SchneiderDept. of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USAMax TegmarkDepartment of Physics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USAD. E. vanden BerkDept. of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USADavid H. WeinbergDepartment of Astronomy, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USADonald G. YorkDepartment of Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
2005en
ABI

Abstract

We combine the constraints from the recent Ly$\ensuremath{\alpha}$ forest analysis of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) and the SDSS galaxy bias analysis with previous constraints from SDSS galaxy clustering, the latest supernovae, and 1st year WMAP cosmic microwave background anisotropies. We find significant improvements on all of the cosmological parameters compared to previous constraints, which highlights the importance of combining Ly$\ensuremath{\alpha}$ forest constraints with other probes. Combining WMAP and the Ly$\ensuremath{\alpha}$ forest we find for the primordial slope ${n}_{s}=0.98\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.02$. We see no evidence of running, $dn/d\mathrm{ln}k=\ensuremath{-}0.003\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.010$, a factor of $3$ improvement over previous constraints. We also find no evidence of tensors, $r&lt;0.36$ ($95%$ c.l.). Inflationary models predict the absence of running and many among them satisfy these constraints, particularly negative curvature models such as those based on spontaneous symmetry breaking. A positive correlation between tensors and primordial slope disfavors chaotic inflation-type models with steep slopes: while the $V\ensuremath{\propto}{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{2}$ model is within the 2-sigma contour, $V\ensuremath{\propto}{\ensuremath{\phi}}^{4}$ is outside the 3-sigma contour. For the amplitude we find ${\ensuremath{\sigma}}_{8}=0.90\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.03$ from the Ly$\ensuremath{\alpha}$ forest and WMAP alone. We find no evidence of neutrino mass: for the case of $3$ massive neutrino families with an inflationary prior, $\ensuremath{\sum}_{}^{}{m}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}&lt;0.42$ eV and the mass of lightest neutrino is ${m}_{1}&lt;0.13$ eV at $95%$ c.l. For the 3 massless $+1$ massive neutrino case we find ${m}_{\ensuremath{\nu}}&lt;0.79$ eV for the massive neutrino, excluding at $95%$ c.l. all neutrino mass solutions compatible with the LSND results. We explore dark energy constraints in models with a fairly general time dependence of dark energy equation of state, finding ${\ensuremath{\Omega}}_{\ensuremath{\lambda}}=0.72\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.02$, $\mathrm{w}(z=0.3)=\ensuremath{-}{0.98}_{\ensuremath{-}0.12}^{+0.10}$, the latter changing to $\mathrm{w}(z=0.3)=\ensuremath{-}{0.92}_{\ensuremath{-}0.10}^{+0.09}$ if tensors are allowed. We find no evidence for variation of the equation of state with redshift, $\mathrm{w}(z=1)=\ensuremath{-}{1.03}_{\ensuremath{-}0.28}^{+0.21}$. These results rely on the current understanding of the Ly$\ensuremath{\alpha}$ forest and other probes, which need to be explored further both observationally and theoretically, but extensive tests reveal no evidence of inconsistency among different data sets used here.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 30 references