Skip to main content
Article

Estimating surface fluxes using eddy covariance and numerical ogive optimization

J. SieversAarhus University, Department of Environmental Science, 4000 Roskilde, DenmarkTim PapakyriakouCentre for Earth Observation Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, CanadaSøren Ejling LarsenDepartment of Wind Energy, Danish Technical University, 4000 Roskilde, DenmarkMathilde JammetCenter for Permafrost (CENPERM), Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, DenmarkSøren RysgaardArctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, DenmarkMikael K. SejrArctic Research Centre, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, DenmarkLise Lotte SørensenAarhus University, Department of Environmental Science, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
2015en
ABI

Abstract

Abstract. Estimating representative surface fluxes using eddy covariance leads invariably to questions concerning inclusion or exclusion of low-frequency flux contributions. For studies where fluxes are linked to local physical parameters and up-scaled through numerical modelling efforts, low-frequency contributions interfere with our ability to isolate local biogeochemical processes of interest, as represented by turbulent fluxes. No method currently exists to disentangle low-frequency contributions on flux estimates. Here, we present a novel comprehensive numerical scheme to identify and separate out low-frequency contributions to vertical turbulent surface fluxes. For high flux rates (|Sensible heat flux| > 40 Wm−2, |latent heat flux|> 20 Wm−2 and |CO2 flux|> 100 mmol m−2 d−1 we found that the average relative difference between fluxes estimated by ogive optimization and the conventional method was low (5–20%) suggesting negligible low-frequency influence and that both methods capture the turbulent fluxes equally well. For flux rates below these thresholds, however, the average relative difference between flux estimates was found to be very high (23–98%) suggesting non-negligible low-frequency influence and that the conventional method fails in separating low-frequency influences from the turbulent fluxes. Hence, the ogive optimization method is an appropriate method of flux analysis, particularly in low-flux environments.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 20 references