Skip to main content
Article

Soil restraints on buried pipelines subjected to reverse-fault displacement

Dharma WijewickremeThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, CanadaManuel MonroyGolder Associates Ltd., 200 - 2920 Virtual Way, Vancouver, BC V5M 0C4, CanadaDouglas G. HoneggerD.G. Honegger Consulting, 2690 Shetland Place, Arroyo Grande, CA 93420, USADouglas J. NymanD.J. Nyman & Associates, 350 Horseshoe Ridge S, Kerrville, TX 78028, USA
2017en
ABI

Abstract

The interaction between a buried pipeline and surrounding soil during large ground displacements is typically simulated using numerical nonlinear soil-restraint springs aligned with the longitudinal axis of the pipeline and in the two directions orthogonal to it. There are only very limited experimental data available to characterize the soil springs for simulating pipelines crossing reverse faults where large oblique soil displacements relative to the pipe could occur. Full-scale model testing was undertaken to evaluate this complex soil–pipe interaction problem. The tests simulated the performance of ∼400 mm diameter (nominal pipe size, NPS 16) pipe specimens buried in moist sand and crushed limestone trench backfill. The peak normalized oblique soil restraint (N θ ) values for oblique pipe movement angles (θ), when θ = 0° (horizontal movement) and θ = 90° (vertical movement), estimated based on state-of-practice approaches, were in agreement with those from full-scale testing. The value of N θ was found to depend significantly on the peak friction angle of soil ([Formula: see text]) when θ was closer to 0°, whereas N θ was less sensitive to [Formula: see text] when θ was beyond about 35°. The theoretical values of N θ based on limit-equilibrium approaches compared well with the experimental findings.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 60 references
Metrics — AkademScholar · Coming soon