Skip to main content
Review article

Current Treatment Options for Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer

Carlo CattriniAcademic Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, ItalyElena CastroCNIO-IBIMA Genitourinary Cancer Unit, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen de la Victoria y Regional de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, 29010 Malaga, SpainR. Lozano MejoradaCNIO-IBIMA Genitourinary Cancer Unit, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen de la Victoria y Regional de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, 29010 Malaga, SpainElisa ZanardiAcademic Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, ItalyA. RubagottiAcademic Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, ItalyFrancesco BoccardoAcademic Unit of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Martino Polyclinic Hospital, 16132 Genoa, ItalyDavid OlmosCNIO-IBIMA Genitourinary Cancer Unit, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen de la Victoria y Regional de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga, 29010 Malaga, Spain
2019en
ABI

Abstract

The possible treatments options for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) have dramatically increased during the last years. The old backbone, which androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is the exclusive approach for hormone-naïve patients, has been disrupted. Despite the fact that several high-quality, randomized, controlled phase 3 trials have been conducted in this setting, no direct comparison is currently available among the different strategies. Inadequate power, absence of preplanning and small sample size frequently affect the subgroup analyses according to disease volume or patient's risk. The choice between ADT alone and ADT combined with docetaxel, abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, apalutamide or radiotherapy to the primary tumor remains challenging. Factors that are related to the tumor, patient or drug side effects, currently guide these clinical decisions. This comprehensive review aims to indirectly compare the phase 3 trials in the mHSPC setting, in order to extrapolate data useful for treatment selection, providing also perspectives on future biomarkers.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 20 references