Skip to main content
Article

Signal-background interference effects for<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math>beyond leading order

Marco BonviniDeutsches Elektronen-Synchroton, DESY, Notkestraße 85, D-22603 Hamburg, GermanyFabrizio CaolaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USAStefano ForteDipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano and INFN, Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, I-20133 Milano, ItalyKirill MelnikovDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, USAGiovanni RidolfiDipartimento di Fisica, Università di Genova and INFN, Sezione di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, I-16146 Genova, Italy
2013lv
ABI

Abstract

We study the effect of QCD corrections to the $gg\ensuremath{\rightarrow}H\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{W}^{+}{W}^{\ensuremath{-}}$ signal-background interference at the LHC for a heavy Higgs boson. We construct a soft-collinear approximation to the next-to-leading order (NLO) and next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) corrections for the background process, which is exactly known only at leading order (LO). We estimate its accuracy by constructing and comparing the same approximation to the exact result for the signal process, which is known up to NNLO, and we conclude that we can describe the signal-background interference to better than $\mathcal{O}(10%)$ accuracy. We show that our result implies that, in practice, a fairly good approximation to higher order QCD corrections to the interference may also be obtained by rescaling the known LO result by a $K$ factor computed using the signal process.

Not yet translated

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 30 references