Skip to main content
Article

Comparison of halide receptors based on H, halogen, chalcogen, pnicogen, and tetrel bonds

Steve ScheinerDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry
2017en
ABI

Abstract

A series of halide receptors are constructed and the geometries and energetics of their binding to F<sup>−</sup>, Cl<sup>−</sup>, and Br<sup>−</sup>assessed by quantum calculations. The dicationic receptors are based on a pair of imidazolium units, connected<italic>via</italic>a benzene spacer. The imidazoliums each donate a proton to a halide in a pair of H-bonds. Replacement of the two bonding protons by Br leads to binding<italic>via</italic>a pair of halogen bonds. Likewise, chalcogen, pnicogen, and tetrel bonds occur when the protons are replaced, respectively, by Se, As, and Ge. Regardless of the binding group considered, F<sup>−</sup>is bound much more strongly than are Cl<sup>−</sup>and Br<sup>−</sup>. With respect to the latter two halides, the binding energy is not very sensitive to the nature of the binding atom, whether H or some other atom. But there is a great deal of differentiation with respect to F<sup>−</sup>, where the order varies as tetrel &gt; H ∼ pnicogen &gt; halogen &gt; chalcogen. The replacement of the various binding atoms by their analogues in the next row of the periodic table enhances the fluoride binding energy by 22–56%. The strongest fluoride binding agents utilize the tetrel bonds of the Sn atom, whereas it is I-halogen bonds that are preferred for Cl<sup>−</sup>and Br<sup>−</sup>. After incorporation of thermal and entropic effects, the halogen, chalcogen, and pnicogen bonding receptors do not represent much of an improvement over H-bonds with regard to this selectivity for F<sup>−</sup>, even I which binds quite strongly. In stark contrast, the tetrel-bonding derivatives, both Ge and Sn, show by far the greatest selectivity for F<sup>−</sup>over the other halides, as much as 10<sup>13</sup>, an enhancement of six orders of magnitude when compared to the H-bonding receptor.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 20 references