Skip to main content
Article

Optimal Allocation of Surface Water Resources at the Provincial Level in the Uzbekistan Region of the Amudarya River Basin

Min WangDepartment of Geography, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, BelgiumXi ChenResearch Center for Ecology and Environment of Central Asia, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, ChinaAyetiguli SidikeSchool of Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, ChinaLiangzhong CaoCollege of Tourism and Geogrphy, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang 332000, ChinaPhilippe De MaeyerDepartment of Geography, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, BelgiumAlishir KurbanSino-Belgian Joint Laboratory of Geo-Information, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
2021en
ABI

Abstract

Water users in the Amudarya River Basin in Uzbekistan are suffering severe water use competition and uneven water allocation, which seriously threatens ecosystems, as shown, for example, in the well-known Aral Sea catastrophe. This study explores the optimized water allocation schemes in the study area at the provincial level under different incoming flow levels, based on the current water distribution quotas among riparian nations, which are usually ignored in related research. The optimization model of the inexact two-stage stochastic programming method is used, which is characterized by probability distributions and interval values. Results show that (1) water allocation is redistributed among five different sectors. Livestock, industrial, and municipality have the highest water allocation priority, and water competition mainly exists in the other two sectors of irrigation and ecology; (2) water allocation is redistributed among six different provinces, and allocated water only in Bukhara and Khorezm can satisfy the upper bound of water demand; (3) the ecological sector can receive a guaranteed water allocation of 8.237–12.354 km3; (4) under high incoming flow level, compared with the actual water distribution, the total allocated water of four sectors (except for ecology) is reduced by 3.706 km3 and total economic benefits are increased by USD 3.885B.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 40 references