Skip to main content
Article

Knowledge gaps in our perceptual model of Great Britain's hydrology

Thorsten WagenerCabot Institute for the Environment University of Bristol Bristol UKSimon DadsonSchool of Geography and the Environment University of Oxford Oxford UKDavid M. HannahSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Science University of Birmingham Birmingham UKGemma CoxonCabot Institute for the Environment University of Bristol Bristol UKKeith BevenLancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UKJohn P. BloomfieldBritish Geological Survey Wallingford Oxfordshire UKWouter BuytaertDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Imperial College London London UKHannah ClokeCentre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science CNDS Uppsala SwedenPaul BatesCabot Institute for the Environment University of Bristol Bristol UKJoseph HoldenWater@leeds, School of Geography University of Leeds Leeds UKLouise ParryArup Leeds UKRob LambJBA Trust, 1 Broughton Park Skipton UKNick A. ChappellLancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster UKMatthew FryUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford UKGareth OldUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford UK
2021en
ABI

Abstract

Abstract There is a no lack of significant open questions in the field of hydrology. How will hydrological connectivity between freshwater bodies be altered by future human alterations to the hydrological cycle? Where does water go when it rains? Or what is the future space–time variability of flood and drought events? However, the answers to these questions will vary with location due to the specific and often poorly understood local boundary conditions and system properties that control the functional behaviour of a catchment or any other hydrologic control volume. We suggest that an open, shared and evolving perceptual model of a region's hydrology is critical to tailor our science questions, as it would be for any other study domain from the plot to the continental scale. In this opinion piece, we begin to discuss the elements of and point out some knowledge gaps in the perceptual model of the terrestrial water cycle of Great Britain. We discuss six major knowledge gaps and propose four key ways to reduce them. While the specific knowledge gaps in our perceptual model do not necessarily transfer to other places, we believe that the development of such perceptual models should be at the core of the debate for all hydrologic communities, and we encourage others to have a similar debate for their hydrologic domain.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 20 references