Skip to main content
Article

Comparison of xenon lamp-based and led-based solar simulators

Gregory P. LearyILX Lightwave-Newport, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United StatesGregg W. SwitzerILX Lightwave-Newport, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United StatesGene KuntzILX Lightwave-Newport, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United StatesTodd KaiserILX Lightwave-Newport, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, United States
2016en
ABI

Abstract

Rapid advances in high intensity light emitting diodes (LEDs) have provided sufficient tools to design LED solar simulators to accurately mimic the sun. LEDs offer numerous advantages over lamp-based technology currently used. However, these advantages have not been harnessed because of limitations in creating a solar simulator with the highest rating (AAA) for spectral match, temporal stability, and light uniformity. Oriel's VeraSol is one of the first LED, triple A solar simulators. The VeraSol-LED was compared to the equally rated Oriel Sol3A-xenon lamp solar simulator by measuring the current-voltage (I-V) response and spectral response (SR) for a variety of solar cells. Both simulators effectively mimic the sun; however, the results demonstrate the LED-based simulator produced a more stable, flexible, and accurate match to AM1.5G than the xenon lamp-based simulator with similar marks in the quality of PV cell response.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 20 references