Skip to main content
Article

LHC EFT WG note: SMEFT predictions, event reweighting, and simulation

Alberto BelvedereDeutsche Elektronen-Synchrotron DESYS. BhattacharyaNorthwestern UniversityG. BoldriniÉcole PolytechniqueS. ChatterjeeAustrian Academy of SciencesA. CalandriSwiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETH)S. Sánchez CruzEuropean Organization for Nuclear ResearchJ. DickinsonFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryFranz GlessgenSwiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETH)R. GoldouzianUniversity of Notre DameA. GrohsjeanDeutsche Elektronen-Synchrotron DESYL. JeppeDeutsche Elektronen-Synchrotron DESYCharlotte KnightImperial College LondonOlivier MattelaerUniversité catholique de LouvainK. MohrmanUniversity of FloridaH. NelsonUniversity of Notre DameV. PerovicSwiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich (ETH)M. PresillaKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyRobert SchoefbeckAustrian Academy of SciencesNick L. SmithFermi National Accelerator Laboratory
2024en
ABI

Abstract

This note provides a comprehensive overview of tools for predicting observables in the Standard Model effective field theory (SMEFT) at both tree level and one loop using event generators. We evaluate three primary methodologies–event reweighting, separate simulation of squared matrix elements, and full SMEFT process simulation–focusing on their statistical performance, computational efficiency, and potential biases. Each approach is assessed in terms of its accuracy, highlighting trade-offs between precision and resource demands. Practical insights into their applicability for high-energy physics analyses are offered, with particular attention to processes where SMEFT effects are significant. Additionally, we discuss the role of helicity in reweighting strategies and its impact on the quality of predictions. By comparing the methods across various LHC processes, this note provides guidance for selecting the most effective strategy for various SMEFT studies, ensuring robust predictions while optimizing computational resources.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 20 references