Skip to main content
Article

Stellar mass functions: methods, systematics and results for the local Universe

Anna K. WeigelInstitute for Astronomy, Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27, CH-8093 Zurich, SwitzerlandKevin SchawinskiInstitute for Astronomy, Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27, CH-8093 Zurich, SwitzerlandClaudio BrudererInstitute for Astronomy, Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27, CH-8093 Zurich, Switzerland
2016en
ABI

Abstract

We present a comprehensive method for determining stellar mass functions, and apply it to samples in the local Universe. We combine the classical 1/<it>V</it><inf>max</inf> approach with STY, a parametric maximum likelihood method and step-wise maximum likelihood, a non-parametric maximum likelihood technique. In the parametric approach, we are assuming that the stellar mass function can be modelled by either a single or a double Schechter function and we use a likelihood ratio test to determine which model provides a better fit to the data. We discuss how the stellar mass completeness as a function of <it>z</it> biases the three estimators and how it can affect, especially the low-mass end of the stellar mass function. We apply our method to Sloan Digital Sky Survey DR7 data in the redshift range from 0.02 to 0.06. We find that the entire galaxy sample is best described by a double Schechter function with the following parameters: log (<it>M</it>*/M<inf>⊙</inf>) = 10.79 ± 0.01, <f>$\\log (\\Phi ^{{\\ast }}_1/h^3\\ \\mathrm{Mpc^{-3}}) = -3.31 \\pm 0.20$</f>, α<inf>1</inf> = −1.69 ± 0.10, <f>$\\log (\\Phi ^{{\\ast }}_2/h^3\\ \\mathrm{Mpc^{-3}}) = -2.01 \\pm 0.28$</f> and α<inf>2</inf> = −0.79 ± 0.04. We also use morphological classifications from Galaxy Zoo and halo mass, overdensity, central/satellite, colour and specific star formation rate measurements to split the galaxy sample into over 130 subsamples. We determine and present the stellar mass functions and the best-fitting Schechter function parameters for each of these subsamples.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 10 references