Skip to main content
Article

Interpretation of the temperature dependence of the electromagnetic penetration depth in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">YBa</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cu</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>

James F. AnnettPhysics Department, The Pennsylvania State University, 104 Davey Laboratory, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802Nigel GoldenfeldPhysics Department, The Pennsylvania State University, 104 Davey Laboratory, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802S. R. RennPhysics Department, The Pennsylvania State University, 104 Davey Laboratory, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
1991lv
ABI

Abstract

The low-temperature behavior of the a-b plane penetration depth, ${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{b}}$, is a probe of the pairing state in ${\mathrm{YBa}}_{2}$${\mathrm{Cu}}_{3}$${\mathrm{O}}_{7\mathrm{\ensuremath{-}}\mathrm{\ensuremath{\delta}}}$. A group-theoretic analysis shows that in orthorhombic or tetragonal crystals all singlet pairing states other than ``s wave'' would lead to \ensuremath{\Delta}${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{b}}$(T)==${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{b}}$(T)-${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{b}}$(0)\ensuremath{\sim}T. In contrast, for an isotropic system, there are combinations of singlet pairing states and field directions that would give rise to \ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\lambda}(T)\ensuremath{\sim}${\mathit{T}}^{3}$. We reanalyze the surface impedance data of Fiory et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1419 (1988)], and show that these data exhibit neither a BCS temperature dependence nor a linear temperature dependence at low temperature, but instead follow \ensuremath{\Delta}${\ensuremath{\lambda}}_{\mathit{a}\mathit{b}}$(T)\ensuremath{\sim}${\mathit{T}}^{2}$. This behavior is probably not intrinsic, and possible explanations are discussed.

Not yet translated

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 30 references