Skip to main content
Article

Accuracy of a New Pulse Oximetry in Detection of Arterial Oxygen Saturation and Heart Rate Measurements: The SOMBRERO Study

Stefano MarinariPasqualina VolpePresidio PneumoTisiologico Territoriale ASL 02, 66100 Chieti, ItalyMarzia SimoniCNR Institute of Clinical Physiology, 56124 Pisa, ItalyMatteo AventaggiatoIndependent Researcher, 73100 Lecce, ItalyFernando De BenedettoS NardiniItalian Multidisciplinary Respiratory Society, 20127 Milan, ItalyClaudio M. SanguinettiEditorial Activities, Italian Multidisciplinary Respiratory Society, 20127 Milan, ItalyPaolo PalangeDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Division of Respiratory Diseases, Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy
2022en
ABI

Abstract

Early diagnosis and continuous monitoring of respiratory failure (RF) in the course of the most prevalent chronic cardio-vascular (CVD) and respiratory diseases (CRD) are a clinical, unresolved problem because wearable, non-invasive, and user-friendly medical devices, which could grant reliable measures of the oxygen saturation (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) in real-life during daily activities are still lacking. In this study, we investigated the agreement between a new medical wrist-worn device (BrOxy M) and a reference, medical pulseoximeter (Nellcor PM 1000N). Twelve healthy volunteers (aged 20−51 years, 84% males, 33% with black skin, obtaining, during the controlled hypoxia test, the simultaneous registration of 219 data pairs, homogeneously deployed in the levels of Sat.O2 97%, 92%, 87%, 82% [ISO 80601-2-61:2017 standard (paragraph EE.3)]) were included. The paired T test 0 and the Bland-Altman plot were performed to assess bias and accuracy. SpO2 and HR readings by the two devices resulted significantly correlated (r = 0.91 and 0.96, p < 0.001, respectively). Analyses excluded the presence of proportional bias. For SpO2, the mean bias was −0.18% and the accuracy (ARMS) was 2.7%. For HR the mean bias was 0.25 bpm and the ARMS3.7 bpm. The sensitivity to detect SpO2 ≤ 94% was 94.4%. The agreement between BrOxy M and the reference pulse oximeter was “substantial” (for SpO2 cut-off 94% and 90%, k = 0.79 and k = 0.80, respectively). We conclude that BrOxy M demonstrated accuracy, reliability and consistency in measuring SpO2 and HR, being fully comparable with a reference medical pulseoxymeter, with no adverse effects. As a wearable device, Broxy M can measure continually SpO2 and HR in everyday life, helping in detecting and following up CVD and CRD subjects.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 20 references