Skip to main content
Article

Defect Detection in Electronics Manufacturing via Deep Learning-Based Visual Inspection

T. SrihariSaveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Saveetha University,Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Chennai,Tamil Nadu,IndiaA. MurugesanK.S.R College of Engineering,Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,IndiaNeeraj KumarDoon institute of engineering and technology,Department of Electrical Engineering,Rishikesh,India,249204T EswaranT.S.M Jain College of Technology,Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,Kallakurichi,Tamilnadu,India,606201T. V. Hyma LakshmiS. R. K. R. Engineering College,E.C.E Department,Bhimavaram,Andhra Pradesh,India,534204K. T. ShivaramDayananda Sagar College of Engineering,Department of Mathematics,Bangalore,India
2025en
ABI

Abstract

The operation of deep learning-based image processing methods for the finding of deformity in electronic parts manufacture. Icing the quality and trustworthiness of manufactured elements has become essential as a result of the increasing complexity and miniaturization of electronic bias. Traditional methods of deformity discovery usually have difficulty keeping up with the ever-changing characteristics of blights and the high-output requirements of ultramodern industrial environments. A promising outcome can be achieved with the application of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) in deep learning, which is a subfield of artificial intelligence. CNNs are used to automatically learn features directly from raw picture data. These models can directly classify and localize blights in electronic factors with a high level of perfection and efficacy. This is accomplished by training CNN models on big datasets of images that have imperfections and photos that do not contain defects. The purpose of this research is to present a comprehensive examination of deep learning methods for the finding of deformity. This analysis includes model infrastructures, training procedures, and performance evaluation criteria.

Identifiers

Citations and references

Cited by 110 references