Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Comparative study of strong-field ionization in laser-irradiated<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math>and other diatomic molecules: Density-functional-theory-based molecular strong-field approximation

V I UsachenkoInstitute of Applied Laser Physics UzAS, Tashkent 100135, UzbekistanPavel PyakPhysics Department, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent 100174, UzbekistanVyacheslav V. KimScientific Association “Akadempribor,” Academy of Sciences of Uzbekistan, Akademgorodok, Tashkent 100125, Uzbekistan
Physical Review Ajournal2009en
ABI

Аннотация

The puzzling phenomenon of no suppression observed in experiments on strong-field ionization of laser-irradiated diatomic ${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ molecules (as compared to its atomic counterpart Ar of nearly equal ionization potential) is addressed within the velocity-gauge formulation of molecular strong-field approximation (SFA). The approach essentially exploits the density-functional-theory (DFT) method applied for numerical composition of initial (laser-free) molecular states using the modified van Leuwen--Baerends (LB-$\ensuremath{\alpha}$) intramolecular binding potential, which incorporates both the exchange and correlation local-spin-density approximation (LSDA) potentials and also allows for construction of initial (laser-free) wave function correctly reproducing molecular and/or atomic valence shells and respective binding energies. Unlike the respective results of earlier alternative strong-field considerations (all predicting a high suppression in ${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ ionization), our DFT SFA based calculation results unambiguously demonstrate no suppression in strong-field ionization of ${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ versus its atomic (Ar) and molecular $({\mathrm{N}}_{2})$ counterparts. Our presented results also suggest that the predominant contribution to ${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ ionization will always be from the $1{\ensuremath{\pi}}_{g}$ highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO, corresponding to the outermost valence shell) and allow for quite a transparent physical interpretation. Namely, the phenomenon of no suppression in ${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ ionization is just explained by the closed-shell nature of its $1{\ensuremath{\pi}}_{g}$ HOMO (and thus by its substantially more enhanced and pronounced electron-correlated response to an incident laser field). Quantitatively, the latter becomes manifest through equally large contributions from the correlation and exchange parts of the intramolecular LSDA potential to ${\mathrm{F}}_{2}$ and ${\mathrm{N}}_{2}$ valence shells, in contrast to ${\mathrm{O}}_{2}$ valence shells, to which the exchange part of the LSDA potential proved to contribute well, predominantly resulting in a high suppression of ionization relative to the atomic counterpart Xe.

Перевод пока недоступен

Темы

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники