Topography of Human Subjects Research Ethics in Uzbekistan: Analysis Using the Emanuel Benchmarks

Emanuel et al. (2004) proposed eight ethical benchmarks to assess the ethical integrity of human participants' research in low- and middle-income countries: collaborative partnership, social value, scientific validity, fair participant selection, favorable risk-benefit ratio, independent review, informed consent, and respect for recruited participants and their communities. We conducted a retrospective, descriptive analysis of 67 doctoral research proposals submitted between 2016 and 2019 to the Tashkent Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education in Uzbekistan.ResultsWhile all protocols addressed social value (67/67) and most demonstrated scientific validity (53/67) and collaborative partnership (40/67), far fewer adequately addressed fair participant selection (12/67), favorable risk-benefit ratio (3/67), independent review (3/67), informed consent (4/67), or respect for communities (3/67).ConclusionThis is the first empirical study to apply the Emanuel framework to doctoral research in Uzbekistan. The findings underscore the need for more systematic integration of these benchmarks into national ethics oversight and academic review procedures.

Перевод пока недоступен