Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Comparison of Intelligent and Traditional Control Systems in Wastewater Treatment Process Control

Jaloliddin EshbobaevDepartment of Automation and Digital Control, Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Tashkent 100000, UzbekistanAlisher Khudoyberdi ugli RakhimovDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Karshi State Technical University, Karshi 180100, UzbekistanAdham NorkobilovDepartment of Industrial Engineering and Management, Karshi State Technical University, Karshi 180100, UzbekistanKomil UsmanovDepartment of Automation and Digital Control, Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Tashkent 100000, UzbekistanZafar TurakulovDepartment of Automation and Digital Control, Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Tashkent 100000, UzbekistanAzizbek KamolovDepartment of Automation and Digital Control, Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Tashkent 100000, UzbekistanSarvar RejabovDepartment of Automation and Digital Control, Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Tashkent 100000, UzbekistanBakhodir KhamidovDepartment of Automation and Digital Control, Tashkent Institute of Chemical Technology, Tashkent 100000, Uzbekistan
2026
ABI

Аннотация

Ion-exchange-based wastewater treatment processes exhibit nonlinear and time-varying dynamics, making the control of total dissolved solids (TDS) and water hardness a complex task. Conventional Proportional–Integral–Derivative (PID) controllers often show limited performance under such conditions due to fixed tuning parameters and linear assumptions. To address these limitations, this study presents a comparative evaluation of traditional and intelligent control strategies for regulating TDS and water hardness through influent flow control. A classical PID controller is compared with fuzzy logic and Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) controllers using a unified MATLAB/Simulink simulation framework. The control performance is evaluated based on dynamic response characteristics, including rise time, settling time, and overshoot. For TDS control, the PID controller exhibits a rise time of 15.9 s and a settling time of 50.9 s, while the fuzzy logic controller improves the response with a rise time of 13.6 s and settling time of 44.1 s. The ANFIS controller achieves the fastest response, with a rise time of 8.31 s and a settling time of 27.1 s. Similar trends are observed for water hardness control, where the PID controller shows a rise time of 17.0 s and settling time of 55.8 s, the fuzzy logic controller reduces these values to 12.3 s and 40.4 s, respectively, and the ANFIS controller further improves performance with a rise time of 9.23 s and settling time of 30.3 s. The overshoot values for all controllers remain comparable, within the range of approximately 4.4–5.0%. The results clearly demonstrate that intelligent control strategies, particularly ANFIS, provide significantly faster convergence and improved dynamic performance compared to conventional PID control. The reduced settling time implies lower control effort and decreased energy consumption, highlighting the potential of intelligent controllers for efficient and reliable industrial wastewater treatment applications.

Перевод пока недоступен

Темы

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 0Использованных источников: 0
Показатели — AkademScholar · Скоро