Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer restaging

G. G. KhakimovaI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)I. V. ReshetovI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)A. D. KaprinP.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of RussiaА. D. ZikiryakhodzhaevI.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)Shakhnoz G. KhakimovaP.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of RussiaF. S. KhugaevaP.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of RussiaV. O. TimoshkinP.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of RussiaI. S. DuadzeP.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
MD-Oncojournal2026
ABI

Аннотация

Aim. To study the role of SLNB in patients with primary operable breast cancer (T1–2N0/N0–1) in restaging depending on the involvement of regional lymph flow (N status). Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 956 women with ductal/lobular stage I–IIB breast cancer. The median age was 54 [45; 63] years. According to the TNM clinical staging system, the patients predominantly had stage IA and IIA cancer. In 94 % of patients, no involvement of the SLN was detected. N+ status was registered in 6 % of patients. Histologically, breast cancer was predominantly represented by invasive ductal carcinoma in 87.5 % of the patients. Depending on the molecular subtype, luminal B HER2neu negative breast cancer was found in 38.2 % of the patients and luminal A subtype in 29.6 %. Moderately differentiated breast cancer was found in 63.5 % of the patients. Results. Median follow-up of the patients was 70.6 [60.0; 82.0] months. Depending on the involvement of the SLN, the following sentinel lymph node biopsy showed the following results: in 77.5 % of the patients, cN0 was confirmed histologically (pN0); in 2.7 %, SLN involvement was staged both clinically and pathologically (cN1–pN1); in 2.8 %, de-escalation of staging was detected (cN1–pN0); and in 0.6 %, SLNB revealed larger volume of damage to the regional lymph collector (cN1–pN2–3). 20 % of the patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Among patients with cN1, SLN involvement (pN1) was significantly more often detected histologically in the group after NACT, 6.8 % versus 1.7 % (p = 0.0001), respectively. In 2.8 % with cN1–pN0, NACT efficacy was significantly higher (12.1 % versus 0.5 %, p = 0.00001). Also, in 16.3 % of the patients, pN1 was significantly more common in the group without NACT (18.5 % versus 7.4 %, p = 0.0002). Conclusion. Conducting SLNB restaged the involvement of the regional lymph collector of T1–2N0/N0–1 patients in 189 (19.8 %) cases. According to the results of SLNB, in 528 (55.2 %) patients with breast cancer, it was possible to refuse lymphadenectomy.

Перевод пока недоступен

Темы

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники