Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Gender-affirming hormone therapy and suicide-related outcomes in transgender and gender-diverse populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mohsen KhosraviDepartment of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences; Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences; Community Nursing Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical SciencesMassimo TusconiDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of CagliariIsa Multazam NoorDr Soeharto Heerdjan Neuropsychiatric Hospital, JakartaChou-Yi HsuThunderbird School of Global Management, Arizona State University, Tempe Campus, Phoenix, ArizonaSamir SahooDepartment of General Medicine, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, OdishaZafar AminovDepartment of Public Health and Healthcare Management, Samarkand State Medical University, SamarkandSwati MishraDepartment of Pharmacology, IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha
Mental Wellnessjournal2026
ABI

Аннотация

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the association between gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and suicide-related outcomes (including suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and suicide death) among transgender and gender-diverse individuals. It included 8 independent studies with 11 effect sizes. The pooled multilevel estimate was not statistically significant but pointed in a negative direction (log odds ratio = -0.3576; 95% confidence interval: -1.2768 to 0.5617; p=0.4458), suggesting a possible but not definitive protective effect of GAHT against suicidality. There was substantial heterogeneity among studies [Q (10)=170.5309, p<0.0001; σ2=1.7820; I2≈94.1%]. Moderator analyses showed that age group was significant [QM (2)=6.9350, p=0.0312], with mixed-age samples differing from adolescent samples, but adult samples did not significantly differ from adolescent samples. Comparator type, study design, and outcome domain were not significant moderators. Sensitivity analyses pointed to influential studies and evidence of funnel asymmetry and small-study effects. The conclusions highlight that while there is a non-significant trend toward a protective effect of GAHT, the evidence is limited by high heterogeneity, influential studies, small-study effects, and the predominantly observational nature of the data. Larger and better-characterized longitudinal studies are needed for clearer causal inference.

Перевод пока недоступен

Темы

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники