Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF POLYPILL THERAPY VERSUS SEPARATE DRUG ADMINISTRATION ON TREATMENT ADHERENCE AND MYOCARDIAL STRUCTURAL REMODELING

Shakhlo FayzullaevaRepublican Specialized Scientific-Practical Medical Center of Cardiology, Tashkent, UzbekistanGulnoza KhamidullaevaRepublican Specialized Scientific-Practical Medical Center of Cardiology, Tashkent, UzbekistanGuzal AbdullaevaRepublican Specialized Scientific-Practical Medical Center of Cardiology, Tashkent, UzbekistanKhafiza YusupovaRepublican Specialized Scientific-Practical Medical Center of Cardiology, Tashkent, UzbekistanSaidburkhon Turg’unboevRepublican Specialized Scientific-Practical Medical Center of Cardiology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Journal of Hypertensionjournal2026en
ABI

Аннотация

Objective: To evaluate the association between adherence to therapy (assessed by the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, MMAS-8) and left ventricular myocardial mass (LVMM) in patients receiving a fixed-dose combination polypill (lisinopril/amlodipine/rosuvastatin) compared with separate therapy (perindopril/amlodipine and rosuvastatin) over a 6-month follow-up. Design and method: The study included 120 patients with arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia at high or very high cardiovascular risk (SCORE2: 18.12 ± 7.83). The mean age was 52.5 ± 9.6 years; the mean duration of hypertension was 8.7 ± 6.6 years. Treatment adherence was evaluated using the MMAS-8 questionnaire. LVMM was measured by transthoracic echocardiography. Patients were randomized into two treatment groups receiving dual antihypertensive therapy plus statin (ACE inhibitor + calcium channel blocker + statin): Group 1 (n = 60): fixed-dose polypill (lisinopril/amlodipine/rosuvastatin); Group 2 (n = 60): separate administration (perindopril/amlodipine and rosuvastatin). Statistical analysis was performed using standard methods of descriptive and correlation statistics. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs) was applied. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 Results: In the polypill group, a statistically significant moderate negative correlation was observed between MMAS-8 scores and LVMM (rs = -0.5768; p =0.001), indicating a greater degree of myocardial mass regression in patients with higher adherence. In contrast, the group receiving separate therapy demonstrated no significant relationship between adherence and LVMM (rs = -0.0452; p = 0.74). The absence of correlation may reflect overall lower adherence in this group, which limits the effect of therapy on reverse left ventricular remodeling. Conclusions: Fixed-dose combination therapy with lisinopril, amlodipine, and rosuvastatin (polypill) is associated with higher medication adherence and greater regression of left ventricular myocardial mass compared with a separate treatment regimen. These findings support the clinical advantages of the polypill strategy in improving adherence, treatment efficacy, and cardioprotective effects in long-term antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy

Перевод пока недоступен

Темы

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 0Использованных источников: 0