Перейти к основному содержанию
Статья

Nitrogen‐Doped Graphene Quantum Dots for Real‐Time Electrochemical Bioelectronics

Seif Al BustanjiFaculty of Technical Education Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research (HCASR), Al‐Ahliyya Amman University Amman JordanAhmed Basheer AyyedDepartment of Dental Medicine AL‐Turath University Baghdad IraqSubhashree RayDepartment of Biochemistry, College of Dental Medicine IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha ‘O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University) Bhubaneswar Odisha IndiaAhmed AldulaimiFaculty of Pharmacy Al‐Zahrawi University Karbala IraqSara abdalkahar sleemanDepartment of Chemistry, College of Education Alnoor University Mosul IraqRasulbek EshmetovDepartment of Natural Science Mamun University Khiva UzbekistanAbduvali SottarovDepartment of Information Technology and Exact Sciences Termez University of Economics and Service Termez UzbekistanRuchi BhartiDepartment of Chemistry University Institute of Sciences, Chandigarh University Mohali Punjab IndiaAhmad AmiriYoung Researchers and Elite Club Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University Tehran Iran
2026en
ABI

Аннотация

ABSTRACT Nitrogen‐doped graphene quantum dots (N‐GQDs) are increasingly investigated for real‐time electrochemical bioelectronics, yet their performance cannot be explained by nitrogen content or conductivity enhancement alone. This review establishes a structure–interface–device framework linking nitrogen configuration, defect topology, quantum confinement, surface chemistry, and transport architecture to electrochemical behavior under physiologically relevant conditions. Cross‐study analysis indicates function‐dependent roles for nitrogen species: pyridinic nitrogen favors adsorption‐mediated sensing and interfacial charge exchange; pyrrolic nitrogen promotes defect‐assisted Faradaic activity, whereas graphitic nitrogen supports conductive continuity and long‐range electron transport. High‐performing N‐GQD systems generally rely on hierarchical integration with conductive polymers, carbon networks, nanocellulose, or hybrid scaffolds rather than isolated quantum‐dot activity. The reviewed literature also reveals a marked imbalance between analytical sensitivity and practical reliability: detection limits and current amplification are widely reported, while signal drift, biofouling, electrode‐to‐electrode reproducibility, continuous operating lifetime, and performance in physiological fluids remain insufficiently quantified. Protein‐corona evolution, ionic competition, and mechanically induced transport changes therefore emerge as critical determinants of real‐time stability. Future progress requires configuration‐specific benchmarking, scalable synthesis, reproducible manufacturing, physiologically realistic validation, and interpretable AI‐assisted signal processing for clinically robust autonomous N‐GQD bioelectronics and application‐specific electrochemical interface engineering strategies.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники