Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

The nature of the X-ray flash of August 24 2005 Photometric evidence for an on-axis z = 0.83 burst with continuous energy injection and an associated supernova?

J. SollermanDark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkJ. P. U. FynboDark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkJ. GorosabelInstituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC), PO Box 3.004, 18. 080 Granada, SpainJ. P. HalpernColumbia Astrophysics Laboratory, 550 West 120th Street, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027-6601, USAJ. HjorthDark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkP. JakobssonCentre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, Collage Lane, Hatfield, Herts, AL10 9AB, UKN. MirabalColumbia Astrophysics Laboratory, 550 West 120th Street, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027-6601, USAD. WatsonDark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkD. XuDark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkA. J. Castro‐TiradoInstituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC), PO Box 3.004, 18. 080 Granada, SpainC. FéronDark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkA. O. JaunsenInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, PO Box 1029, 0315 Oslo, NorwayM. JelínekInstituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC), PO Box 3.004, 18. 080 Granada, SpainB. L. JensenDark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkД. А. КаннThüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg, Sternwarte 5, 07778 Tautenburg, GermanyJ. E. OvaldsenInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, PO Box 1029, 0315 Oslo, NorwayA. PozanenkoSpace Research Institute (IKI), 84/32 Profsoyuznaya Str, Moscow 117997, RussiaM. StritzingerDark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkC. C. ThöneDark Cosmology Centre, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Maries Vej 30, 2100 Copenhagen Ø, DenmarkA. de Ugarte PostigoInstituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC), PO Box 3.004, 18. 080 Granada, SpainS. GuziyInstituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (IAA-CSIC), PO Box 3.004, 18. 080 Granada, SpainM. IbrahimovUlugh Beg Astronomical Institute, Tashkent 700052, UzbekistanS. P. JärvinenAstronomy Division, PO Box 3000, 90014 University of Oulu, FinlandA. J. LevanCentre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, Collage Lane, Hatfield, Herts, AL10 9AB, UKV. RumyantsevCrimean Laboratory of Sternberg Astronomical Institute MSU, Nauchny, Crimea, 98409, UkraineN. R. TanvirCentre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, Collage Lane, Hatfield, Herts, AL10 9AB, UK
Figsharerepository2007en
ABI

Аннотация

Aims.Our aim is to investigate the nature of the X-Ray Flash (XRF) of August 24, 2005.\nMethods.We present comprehensive photometric R-band observations of the fading optical afterglow of XRF 050824, from 11 min to 104 days after the burst. In addition we present observations taken during the first day in the $\\it BRIK$ bands and two epochs of spectroscopy. We also analyse available X-ray data.\nResults.The R-band lightcurve of the afterglow resembles the lightcurves of long duration Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), i.e., a power-law, albeit with a rather shallow slope of $\\alpha=0.6$ ( $F_{\\nu} \\propto t^{-\\alpha}$). Our late R-band images reveal the host galaxy. The rest-frame B-band luminosity is ~0.5 L*. The star-formation rate as determined from the [O II] emission line is ~ $1.8~M_{\\odot}$ yr-1. When accounting for the host contribution, the slope is $\\alpha=0.65$ $\\pm$ 0.01 and a break in the lightcurve is suggested. A potential lightcurve bump at 2 weeks can be interpreted as a supernova only if this is a supernova with a fast rise and a fast decay. However, the overall fit still shows excess scatter in the lightcurve in the form of wiggles and bumps. The flat lightcurves in the optical and X-rays could be explained by a continuous energy injection scenario, with an on-axis viewing angle and a wide jet opening angle ( $\\theta_j \\ga {10}^\\circ$). If the energy injections are episodic this could potentially help explain the bumps and wiggles.\n\nSpectroscopy of the afterglow gives a redshift of z=0.828 $\\pm$ 0.005 from both absorption and emission lines. The spectral energy distribution (SED) of the afterglow has a power-law ( $F_{\\nu} \\propto \\nu ^{-\\beta}$) shape with slope ${\\beta}=0.56$ $\\pm$ 0.04. This can be compared to the X-ray spectral index which is ${\\beta_{\\rm X}}=1.0$ $\\pm$ 0.1. The curvature of the SED constrains the dust reddening towards the burst to $A_{\\rm v}<0.5$ mag.

Перевод пока недоступен

Темы

Цитирования и источники