Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II

Dean G. AssimosAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, MarylandAmy E. KrambeckAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, MarylandNicole L. MillerAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, MarylandManoj MongaAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, MarylandM. Hassan MuradAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, MarylandCaleb P. NelsonAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, MarylandKenneth T. PaceAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, MarylandVernon M. PaisAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, MarylandMargaret S. PearleAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, MarylandGlenn M. PremingerAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, MarylandHassan RazviAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, MarylandOjas ShahAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, MarylandBrian R. MatlagaAmerican Urological Association Education and Research, Inc., Linthicum, Maryland
2016en
ABI

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This Guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the surgical management of patients with kidney and/or ureteral stones. The summary presented herein represents Part II of the two-part series dedicated to Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. Please refer to Part I for introductory information and a discussion of pre-operative imaging and special cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature (search dates 1/1/1985 to 5/31/2015) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed studies relevant to the surgical management of stones. The review yielded an evidence base of 1,911 articles after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. These publications were used to create the Guideline statements. Evidence-based statements of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendation were developed based on benefits and risks/burdens to patients. Additional directives are provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions when insufficient evidence existed. RESULTS: The Panel identified 12 adult Index Patients to represent the most common cases seen in clinical practice. Three additional Index Patients were also created to describe the more commonly encountered special cases, including pediatric and pregnant patients. With these patients in mind, Guideline statements were developed to aid the clinician in identifying optimal management. CONCLUSIONS: Proper treatment selection, which is directed by patient- and stone-specific factors, remains the greatest predictor of successful treatment outcomes. This Guideline is intended for use in conjunction with the individual patient's treatment goals. In all cases, patient preferences and personal goals should be considered when choosing a management strategy.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0