Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Screening metal–organic frameworks for selective noble gas adsorption in air: effect of pore size and framework topology

Marie V. ParkesGeochemistry Department, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185, USAChad StaigerMaterials, Devices, and Energy Technologies Department, Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USAJohn J. PerryEnergy Nanomaterials Department, Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 969, Livermore, California, USAMark D. AllendorfEnergy Nanomaterials Department, Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 969, Livermore, California, USAJeffery A. GreathouseGeochemistry Department, Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
2013en
ABI

Аннотация

The adsorption of noble gases and nitrogen by sixteen metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) was investigated using grand canonical Monte Carlo simulation. The MOFs were chosen to represent a variety of net topologies, pore dimensions, and metal centers. Three commercially available MOFs (HKUST-1, AlMIL-53, and ZIF-8) and PCN-14 were also included for comparison. Experimental adsorption isotherms, obtained from volumetric and gravimetric methods, were used to compare krypton, argon, and nitrogen uptake with the simulation results. Simulated trends in gas adsorption and predicted selectivities among the commercially available MOFs are in good agreement with experiment. In the low pressure regime, the expected trend of increasing adsorption with increasing noble gas polarizabilty is seen. For each noble gas, low pressure adsorption correlates with several MOF properties, including free volume, topology, and metal center. Additionally, a strong correlation exists between the Henry's constant and the isosteric heat of adsorption for all gases and MOFs considered. Finally, we note that the simulated and experimental gas selectivities demonstrated by this small set of MOFs show improved performance compared to similar values reported for zeolites.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 3Использованных источников: 0