Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Is there a novel Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet theory in four dimensions?

Metin GürsesDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Bilkent University, 06800, Ankara, TurkeyTahsin Çağrı ŞişmanDepartment of Astronautical Engineering, University of Turkish Aeronautical Association, 06790, Ankara, TurkeyBayram TekinDepartment of Physics, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey
2020en
ABI

Аннотация

Abstract No! We show that the field equations of Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet theory defined in generic $$D&gt;4$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> dimensions split into two parts one of which always remains higher dimensional, and hence the theory does not have a non-trivial limit to $$D=4$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> . Therefore, the recently introduced four-dimensional, novel, Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet theory does not admit an intrinsically four-dimensional definition, in terms of metric only, as such it does not exist in four dimensions. The solutions (the spacetime, the metric) always remain $$D&gt;4$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> dimensional. As there is no canonical choice of 4 spacetime dimensions out of D dimensions for generic metrics, the theory is not well defined in four dimensions.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 12Использованных источников: 0
Показатели — AkademScholar · Скоро