Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Estimating the galaxy two-point correlation function using a split random catalog

E. KeihänenH. Kurki-SuonioDepartment of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hllstrmin katu 2, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandV. LindholmDepartment of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hllstrmin katu 2, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandA. ViitanenDepartment of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hllstrmin katu 2, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandA.-S. Suur-UskiDepartment of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hllstrmin katu 2, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandV. AllevatoDepartment of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hllstrmin katu 2, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandE. BranchiniDepartment of Mathematics and Physics, Roma Tre University, Via della Vasca Navale 84, 00146 Rome, ItalyF. MarulliP. NorbergICC & CEA, Department of Physics, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UKD. TavagnaccoINAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via Tiepolo 11, 34131 Trieste, ItalyS. de la TorreAix Marseille Univ., CNRS, CNES, LAM, Marseille, FranceJ. ValiviitaDepartment of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hllstrmin katu 2, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandM. VielJ. BelAix Marseille Univ., Universit de Toulon, CNRS, CPT, Marseille, FranceM. FrailisINAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via Tiepolo 11, 34131 Trieste, ItalyA. G. Sánchez
2019en
ABI

Аннотация

The two-point correlation function of the galaxy distribution is a key cosmological observable that allows us to constrain the dynamical and geometrical state of our Universe. To measure the correlation function we need to know both the galaxy positions and the expected galaxy density field. The expected field is commonly specified using a Monte-Carlo sampling of the volume covered by the survey and, to minimize additional sampling errors, this random catalog has to be much larger than the data catalog. Correlation function estimators compare data–data pair counts to data–random and random–random pair counts, where random–random pairs usually dominate the computational cost. Future redshift surveys will deliver spectroscopic catalogs of tens of millions of galaxies. Given the large number of random objects required to guarantee sub-percent accuracy, it is of paramount importance to improve the efficiency of the algorithm without degrading its precision. We show both analytically and numerically that splitting the random catalog into a number of subcatalogs of the same size as the data catalog when calculating random–random pairs and excluding pairs across different subcatalogs provides the optimal error at fixed computational cost. For a random catalog fifty times larger than the data catalog, this reduces the computation time by a factor of more than ten without affecting estimator variance or bias.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 4Использованных источников: 0