Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Обзорная статья

Transfer Learning for EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interfaces: A Review of Progress Made Since 2016

Dongrui WuMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Image Processing and Intelligent Control, School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaYifan XuMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Image Processing and Intelligent Control, School of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, ChinaBao‐Liang LuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Center for Brain-Like Computing and Machine Intelligence, Key Laboratory of Shanghai Education Commission for Intelligent Interaction and Cognitive Engineering, Brain Science and Technology Research Center, and the Qing Yuan Research Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
2020en
ABI

Аннотация

A brain–computer interface (BCI) enables a user to communicate with a computer directly using brain signals. The most common noninvasive BCI modality, electroencephalogram (EEG), is sensitive to noise/artifact and suffers between-subject/within-subject nonstationarity. Therefore, it is difficult to build a generic pattern recognition model in an EEG-based BCI system that is optimal for different subjects, during different sessions, for different devices and tasks. Usually, a calibration session is needed to collect some training data for a new subject, which is time consuming and user unfriendly. Transfer learning (TL), which utilizes data or knowledge from similar or relevant subjects/sessions/devices/tasks to facilitate learning for a new subject/session/device/task, is frequently used to reduce the amount of calibration effort. This article reviews journal publications on TL approaches in EEG-based BCIs in the last few years, i.e., since 2016. Six paradigms and applications—motor imagery, event-related potentials, steady-state visual evoked potentials, affective BCIs, regression problems, and adversarial attacks—are considered. For each paradigm/application, we group the TL approaches into cross-subject/session, cross-device, and cross-task settings and review them separately. Observations and conclusions are made at the end of the article, which may point to future research directions.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0