Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults

Domenica A. DelgadoHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX (Ms. Delgado, Dr. Lambert, Dr. Boutris, Dr. McCulloch, Dr. Moreno, and Dr. Harris), and Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Dr. Lambert, Mr. Robbins, and Dr. Moreno)Bradley S. LambertHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX (Ms. Delgado, Dr. Lambert, Dr. Boutris, Dr. McCulloch, Dr. Moreno, and Dr. Harris), and Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Dr. Lambert, Mr. Robbins, and Dr. Moreno)Nickolas BoutrisHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX (Ms. Delgado, Dr. Lambert, Dr. Boutris, Dr. McCulloch, Dr. Moreno, and Dr. Harris), and Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Dr. Lambert, Mr. Robbins, and Dr. Moreno)Patrick C. McCullochHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX (Ms. Delgado, Dr. Lambert, Dr. Boutris, Dr. McCulloch, Dr. Moreno, and Dr. Harris), and Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Dr. Lambert, Mr. Robbins, and Dr. Moreno)Andrew B. RobbinsHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX (Ms. Delgado, Dr. Lambert, Dr. Boutris, Dr. McCulloch, Dr. Moreno, and Dr. Harris), and Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Dr. Lambert, Mr. Robbins, and Dr. Moreno)Michael R. MorenoHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX (Ms. Delgado, Dr. Lambert, Dr. Boutris, Dr. McCulloch, Dr. Moreno, and Dr. Harris), and Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Dr. Lambert, Mr. Robbins, and Dr. Moreno)Joshua D. HarrisHouston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX (Ms. Delgado, Dr. Lambert, Dr. Boutris, Dr. McCulloch, Dr. Moreno, and Dr. Harris), and Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (Dr. Lambert, Mr. Robbins, and Dr. Moreno)
2018en
ABI

Аннотация

Background: The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between “no pain” and “worst pain.” Methods: One hundred consecutive patients aged ≥18 years who presented with a chief complaint of pain were asked to record pain scores via a paper VAS and digitally via both the laptop computer and mobile phone. Ninety-eight subjects, 51 men (age, 44 ± 16 years) and 47 women (age, 46 ± 15 years), were included. A mixed-model analysis of covariance with the Bonferroni post hoc test was used to detect differences between the paper and digital VAS scores. A Bland–Altman analysis was used to test for instrument agreement between the platforms. The minimal clinically important difference was set at 1.4 cm (14% of total scale length) for detecting clinical relevance between the three VAS platforms. A paired one-tailed Student t-test was used to determine whether differences between the digital and paper measurement platforms exceeded 14% (P < 0.05). Results: A significant difference in scores was found between the mobile phone–based (32.9% ± 0.4%) and both the laptop computer– and paper-based platforms (31.0% ± 0.4%, P < 0.01 for both). These differences were not clinically relevant (minimal clinically important difference <1.4 cm). No statistically significant difference was observed between the paper and laptop computer platforms. Measurement agreement was found between the paper- and laptop computer–based platforms (mean difference, 0.0% ± 0.5%; no proportional bias detected) but not between the paper- and mobile phone–based platforms (mean difference, 1.9% ± 0.5%; proportional bias detected). Conclusion: No clinically relevant difference exists between the traditional paper-based VAS assessment and VAS scores obtained from laptop computer– and mobile phone–based platforms.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0