Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry
Philippe AghionHarvard University, National Bureau of Economic Research, and Canadian Institute for Advanced ResearchAntoine DechezleprêtreGrantham Research Institute and Centre for Economic Performance, London School of EconomicsDavid HémousRalf MartinImperial College, Grantham Institute, and Centre for Economic Performance, London School of EconomicsJohn Van ReenenCentre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, and National Bureau of Economic Research
2016en
ABI
Аннотация
Can directed technical change be used to combat climate change? We construct new firm-level panel data on auto industry innovation distinguishing between “dirty” (internal combustion engine) and “clean” (e.g., electric, hybrid, and hydrogen) patents across 80 countries over several decades. We show that firms tend to innovate more in clean (and less in dirty) technologies when they face higher tax-inclusive fuel prices. Furthermore, there is path dependence in the type of innovation (clean/dirty) both from aggregate spillovers and from the firm’s own innovation history. We simulate the increases in carbon taxes needed to allow clean technologies to overtake dirty technologies.
Перевод пока недоступен
Идентификаторы
Цитирования и источники
Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0