Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Prospective Evaluation of Bilateral Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Is It Really Safe?

Alexandre DanilovicDepartment of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, BrazilFábio César Miranda TorricelliDepartment of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, BrazilGiovanni Scala MarchiniDepartment of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, BrazilCarlos BatagelloDepartment of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, BrazilFábio C. VicentiniDepartment of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, BrazilOlivier TraxerMiguel SrougiDepartment of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, BrazilWilliam Carlos NahasDepartment of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, BrazilEduardo MazzucchiDepartment of Urology, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
2020en
ABI

Аннотация

Introduction: The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the outcomes of bilateral same-session retrograde intrarenal surgery (BSS RIRS) with unilateral RIRS and to compare the outcomes of first with second operated kidneys in BSS RIRS. Subjects and Methods: Consecutive symptomatic adult patients with kidney stones up to 20 mm who accepted to be treated by RIRS were prospectively studied. Stone-free rate (SFR) was evaluated by non-contrast CT for each renal unit, and surgical complications were evaluated based on Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: SFR (73.9% vs 76.1%, p = 0.830) and hospitalization time (14.43 ± 18.81 hours vs 13.00 ± 4.89 hours, p = 0.564) were similar between unilateral and BSS RIRS groups, with less consumption of disposable devices in BSS RIRS (p = 0.017). Operative time was longer in BSS RIRS (61.24 ± 26.62 minutes vs 88.65 ± 33.19 minutes, p < 0.001). Bilateral group had significant more overall complications by Clavien-Dindo classification than unilateral (15.9% vs 39.9%, p = 0.030) and more emergency room (ER) visits (11.6% vs 34.8%, p = 0.026). Moreover, although both groups temporarily increased creatinine levels, it was significantly higher in bilateral RIRS (p = 0.019). First operated kidney outcomes were similar to second operated kidney outcomes of BSS RIRS. Conclusion: Although BSS RIRS had similar SFR and consumed less disposable devices, it had a higher overall complication rate, a higher frequency of ER visits, and higher creatinine levels during follow-up than unilateral RIRS. There is no significant outcome difference between first and second operated kidneys in BSS RIRS.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 6Использованных источников: 0