Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Prediction of TNM stage in head and neck cancer using hybrid machine learning systems and radiomics features

Mohammadreza SalmanpourBC Cancer Research Institute (Canada)Mahdi HosseinzadehTarbiat Modares Univ. (Iran, Islamic Republic of)Azizeh AkbariHakim Sabzevari Univ. (Iran, Islamic Republic of)Kasra BorazjaniTechnological Virtual Collaboration Co. (Canada)Kasra MojallalAmirkabir Univ. of Technology (Iran, Islamic Republic of)Dariush AskariShahid Beheshti Univ. of Medical Sciences (Iran, Islamic Republic of)Ghasem HajianfarShaheed Rajaie Cardiovascular, Medical & Research Ctr. (Iran, Islamic Republic of)Seyed Masoud RezaeijoThe Univ. of British Columbia (Canada)Mohammad Mehdi GhaemiTechnological Virtual Collaboration Co. (Canada)Amir Hossein NabizadehBC Cancer Research Institute (Canada)Arman RahmimBC Cancer Research Institute (Canada)
2022en
ABI

Аннотация

The tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging system enables clinicians to describe the spread of head-and-necksquamous-cell-carcinoma (HNSCC) cancer in a specific manner to assist with the assessment of disease status, prognosis, and management. This study aims to predict TNM staging for HNSCC cancer via Hybrid Machine Learning Systems (HMLSs) and radiomics features. In our study, 408 patients were included from the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) database, included in a multi-center setting. PET images were registered to CT, enhanced, and cropped. We created 9 sets including CT-only, PET-only, and 7 PET-CT fusion sets. Next, 215 radiomics features were extracted from HNSCC tumor segmented by the physician via our standardized SERA radiomics package. We employed multiple HMLSs, including 16 feature-extraction (FEA) + 9 feature selection algorithms (FSA) linked with 8 classifiers optimized by grid-search approach, with model training, fine-tuning, and selection (5-fold cross-validation; 319 patients), followed by external-testing of selected model (89 patients). Datasets were normalized by z-score-technique, with accuracy reported to compare models. We first applied datasets with all features to classifiers only; accuracy of 0.69 ± 0.06 was achieved via PET applied to Random Forest classifier (RFC); performance of external testing (~ 0.62) confirmed our finding. Subsequently, we employed FSAs/FEAs prior to the application of classifiers. We achieved accuracy of 0.70 ± 0.03 for Curvelet transform (fusion) + Correlation-based Feature Selection (FSA) + K-Nearest Neighbor (classifier), and 0.70 ± 0.05 for PET + LASSO (FSA) + RFC (classifier). Accuracy of external testing (0.65 & 0.64) also confirmed these findings. Other HMLSs, applied on some fused datasets, also resulted in close performances. We demonstrate that classifiers or HMLSs linked with PET only and PET-CT fusion techniques enabled relatively low improved accuracy in predicting TNM stage. Meanwhile, the combination of PET and RFC enabled good prediction of TNM in HNSCC.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 7Использованных источников: 0