Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences

Philip M. PodsakoffWarrington College of Business Administration, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USAScott MacKenzieDepartment of Marketing, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USANathan P. PodsakoffDepartment of Management and Organizations, Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
2016en
ABI

Аннотация

Despite the importance of establishing good, clear concept definitions in organizational research, the field lacks a comprehensive source that explains how to effectively develop and articulate a concept’s domain. Thus, the purpose of this article is to explain why clear conceptual definitions are essential for scientific progress and provide a concrete set of steps that researchers can follow to improve their conceptual definitions. First, we define what is meant by a concept, describe the functions served by concepts in scientific endeavors, and identify problems associated with a lack of conceptual clarity. Then we explain why it is so difficult to adequately define concepts. Next, we provide a series of recommendations for scholars in the organizational, behavioral, and social sciences who are either trying to define a new concept or revise the definition of one that already exists in the field. Following this, we provide some examples that generally meet the criteria for a good conceptual definition. We conclude with a set of questions that authors, reviewers, and editors can use as a guide for evaluating concept definitions.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0