Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research

Nathalie Percie du SertExperimental Design and Reporting, NC3Rs, London, UK. [email protected]Viki HurstExperimental Design and Reporting, NC3Rs, London, UKAmrita AhluwaliaBarts Cardiovascular CTU, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKSabina AlamPublishing Ethics and Integrity, Taylor & Francis Group, London, UKMarc T. AveyHealth Science Practice, ICF, Durham, North Carolina, USAMonya BakerOpinion, Nature, San Francisco, California, USAWilliam J. BrowneSchool of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKAlejandra ClarkLife Sciences, PLOS ONE, Cambridge, UKInnes C. CuthillSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UKUlrich DirnaglQUEST Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health & Department of Experimental Neurology, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyMichael EmersonNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UKPaul GarnerCentre for Evidence Synthesis in Global Health, Clinical Sciences Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UKStephen T. HolgateClinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UKDavid W. HowellsTasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, AustraliaNatasha A. KarpData Sciences & Quantitative Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UKStanley E. LazicPrioris.ai Inc, Ottawa, CanadaKatie LidsterAnimal Welfare, NC3Rs, London, UKCatriona MacCallumOpen Science, Hindawi Ltd, London, UKMalcolm MacleodCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKEsther J. PearlExperimental Design and Reporting, NC3Rs, London, UKOle H. PetersenAcademia Europaea Knowledge Hub, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UKFrances RawlePolicy, Ethics and Governance, Medical Research Council, London, UKPenny S. ReynoldsStatistics in Anesthesiology Research (STAR), Department of Anesthesiology College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USAKieron RooneyDiscipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaEmily S. SenaCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKShai D. SilberbergResearch Quality, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USAThomas StecklerJanssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, BelgiumHanno WürbelVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
2020en
ABI

Аннотация

Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into 2 sets, the "ARRIVE Essential 10," which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the "Recommended Set," which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts, and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers, and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0